Aston Martin one-77 Already Sold Out

Aston Martin one-77
Aston Martin one-77
Aston Martin one-77
Aston Martin one-77
Aston Martin one-77

Add a Comment

Comments (17)

newest first oldest first

wooow...I wish I was in the order list

October 15, 2008 4:42 pm

report abuse | reply

Airbag

I'll take a One-77 Zagato please!

October 15, 2008 5:06 pm

report abuse | reply

Penner

Yeah, If I had the money, I'd buy every crap, too!

October 15, 2008 5:07 pm

report abuse | reply

jalmonte91

i dont see how this aston is worth $2 million. I mean i love astons, but they need to slow down on the pricing, no wonder they are only doing 100. On the other hand those new owners are smart

October 15, 2008 5:08 pm

report abuse | reply

3 replies

IpsesNipse

why oh why do you think they are smart?? They sre buying a car that looks exactly the same as a normal DB9, has a slightly bigger engine and output. Most wont even see the difference between it and a DB9, I dont call it exclusive just cause it has a different name than the normal model. I cant see how billionairs are so blind for exclusivity that they are willing to pay 10x the price of slightly different DB9.

October 15, 2008 6:13 pm

report abuse | reply

Bristol411S3

It's worth what people will pay for it. Image wise, Aston is on the ascent. They only need to find 77 people globally to pay £1.2M for a niche car. There are thousands of billionaires globally, a significant proportion of which have no taste.

October 15, 2008 10:17 pm

report abuse | reply

jalmonte91

The reason i said they were smart was because you are right, all they did was slap a new price tag on a db9. And that is smart from a owner's point of view

October 16, 2008 12:57 pm

report abuse | reply

great_supercars255

already? but even so, you cant test drive it, its first come first served... i wish i had one.

October 15, 2008 5:16 pm

report abuse | reply

mechamynd

One-77 may not worth this much money, but its prestige

October 15, 2008 6:25 pm

report abuse | reply

benz_man

As beautiful as this car is, I doubt its worth anywhere near the price required for access. However, this is a great way for AM to raise capital for future products. At $2M a pop, that means $154M will be raised for a car that, more than likely, has cost a third of that to engineer and build. Aston must have something creative up its sleeve that will require a large capital investment. Makes me excited to think about it.

October 15, 2008 6:28 pm

report abuse | reply

Murcielago2006

I think supercar makers should stop with this crap. If you are going to make such an expensive car then it has to be worth it. Taking a 150k car, changing the styling then slapping a million pound price tag on it is just ridiculous. And as much as I like the Lamo Reventon, it has the same problem, its basically an LP640 with a modified styling. This is why these cars are not worth the price but a Veryon is worth every penny.

October 15, 2008 9:23 pm

report abuse | reply

nendor

A lot of people don't care about the design or power they care about the price :P so if it very expensive they should get it :P

October 15, 2008 10:00 pm

report abuse | reply

GanSan

I can't wait to drive this in Forza! That's as far as I'd go. Astons' performance haven't been worth their inflated price before, why should this be any better? They might be some of the nicest looking cars around, but I would never pay for looks over performance.

October 16, 2008 12:16 am

report abuse | reply

Its damn great!!!!!!!!!!!!!! just look at it!

October 16, 2008 3:22 am

report abuse | reply

77 One-77s adds up to Aston Martin getting £91 million, which is a lot of money. So hopefully Aston will be making a lot more beautiful cars in the future. Anyway, nice work with the One-77 design anyway Aston. Finally, for all you commenters out there, did you know that this car was designed by a guy from Sheffield, UK.

October 16, 2008 4:56 am

report abuse | reply

1 reply

LP560_4

Shouldn't the Veyron be the third? The Reventon was 1 Million Euros?

October 28, 2008 4:37 pm

report abuse | reply