Ford Introduces MyKey Parenting Tool for Teen Drivers

New technology to keep teen drivers safe

Add a Comment

Comments (48)

 Hardboy997 Hardboy997
Would be great to see it in Europe!
October 7, 2008 4:55 pm
 M.V.P. M.V.P.
How stupid it that, how about working on better designs instead of stupid stuff like that Ford.
October 7, 2008 5:18 pm
 Joe_Limon Joe_Limon
It's a huge option to put on vehicles. Just think of all the overly concerned parents who don't want to buy their teens vehicles.
October 7, 2008 5:33 pm
 M.V.P. M.V.P.
Yeah, and why volume control?
October 7, 2008 5:42 pm
 m4rtins m4rtins
MVP - shame there is no mykeyboard function preventing you from writing stupid comments. If you're old enough to buy a car, you don't have to use the mykey function. It doesn't affect you. If you're not old enough to buy a car, I'm glad your brains aren't on the road.........
October 7, 2008 6:01 pm
 Joe_Limon Joe_Limon
volume control is for the parents that don't want their kids blasting their ears. Loud music is also a distraction studies have shown that music past a certain level decreases driver awareness.
October 7, 2008 6:53 pm
 carcrazy1234 carcrazy1234
thank you joe for just bringing down the dumba$$'s... seriously haha are u serious M.V.P.??? damn man
October 8, 2008 12:02 am
 mmr66 mmr66
dad i dont want a ford :-)
October 7, 2008 5:44 pm
 yas609 yas609
well guess what son, im paying for it so i dont care what you want.
October 7, 2008 5:48 pm
 dmanero dmanero
I know thisa is going to bite me in the A$%, but we all know that a mother probably came up with this idea. How many fathers will argue this, plus if the parent is stupid enough to give the car keys to their Teen and know very well that they are not responsble enough to drive, it's their own fault if they cause an accident. too bad there will be bystanders involved.
October 7, 2008 6:28 pm
 YankeeDoodleDandy YankeeDoodleDandy
What a great idea! should also be adapted for some jack arse adults. Not all dangerous dirvers are kids. Should also be used as an insurance reduction initiative. In many locales where young amles in particular get hit hard by high insurance costs this may be one way of reducing.
October 7, 2008 6:33 pm
 dmanero dmanero
Couldn't agree with you more that there are a good percentage are adult drivers. But I bet you will not se a reduction in the insurance. Insurance compnaies would rather take all your money than trying to spare you on the premiums
October 7, 2008 6:44 pm
 wjaprep wjaprep
*3am friday night, 17 y/o son switches his key and his mothers key to their Ford Explorer* son- hey mom, can i borrow the car? mom- sure, use your key. *son drives down highweigh @ 80 mph blasting T.I., then returns the car* *next day mom is late for work so she tries to floor it, but the car only goes up to 50mph* Yep, easy as that.
October 7, 2008 7:23 pm
 wjaprep wjaprep
but, I do think the seatbelt thing is a good idea, I think the car shouldnt start until the seatbelt is buckled in all cars.
October 7, 2008 7:25 pm
 afterace2 afterace2
it may be annoying, but it's a quite good idea. I really should have one when I drove my dad's car when I was young ;P
October 7, 2008 7:36 pm
 Tuner_Mad Tuner_Mad
Haha, that would be a great tool. Now, If only I could drive...
October 7, 2008 7:46 pm
 gmfan09 gmfan09
The only thing I don't like about this is that its goin to put a soar taste in young drivers mouths about Ford cars. The parents will buy them one while there in high school but when that kid grows up their not going to buy one because Ford will always be the car brand with the training wheels they first started on.
October 7, 2008 8:00 pm
 djcocum djcocum
I think this is stupid. You can always steal your parents ' keys. This way top speed would be 100mph instead of 85
October 7, 2008 9:14 pm
 carcrazy1234 carcrazy1234
why would u drive a 100 mph in a ford focus... or a ford in general minus the GT??? think about it hahaha
October 8, 2008 12:03 am
 benz_man benz_man
This is a great idea, and should make Ford at least a little extra money. But its just addressing the symptom and not the cause. How about every driver (young & old) be required to learn vehicle dynamics before they can acquire (or renew) their license. If you know how the vehicle is going to react in adverse conditions, you'll be prepared to react in a reasonable (and life saving) fashion. The American driving system is a joke!
October 8, 2008 12:01 am
 kevoluetion kevoluetion
Yea i read about this, its a great idea!! That will make kids show off less and not be a danger on the roads. It would be better if this technology is available on many other makes too.
October 8, 2008 12:07 am
 pzigly pzigly
I know everyone will be pissed at me when I say this, but its my opinion. This is a stupid idea! First off I think its just move by ford to protect themselves from warrenty issues by not letting teens abuse their cars. Toyota did something similar by cutting all of their sport cars to shoot up there reliability on paper (a Relative that works at toyota told me that). Second you dont remember when you were a kid and blasted the music as u went by, you felt freedom for the first time. Ford is taking the fun out of driving. As long as parents prevent u from getting subs, you should be ok with awareness. I am more responsive and aware (aggressive sometimes) when the music is loud. Third, limiting the speed will not prevent kids from driving fast. It might actually do damage. If ur driving 80 and ur bored going a constant speed the whole time like cruise control, you might stop paying attention to the road. You have to let kids make mistakes. How else will they learn? People will argue that mistakes can cause lives, but I argue that those lives lost are meaningful and reality checks to other teens. Growing up is about making mistakes. If you cant think for yourself, then you become dependent on your parents.
October 8, 2008 5:54 am
 pzigly pzigly
sry for spelling: warranty^ and reality check^
October 8, 2008 6:03 am
 benz_man benz_man
How old are you Pzigly?
October 8, 2008 9:31 pm
 pzigly pzigly
23
October 8, 2008 11:58 pm
 kevoluetion kevoluetion
This is to prevent kids from going too far, by the time they learn from their mistakes they are either in hospital or got their passengers in hospital. There are better ways to learn. This is much more serious than protection from bugs. Not to mention they can cause harm to others on the road
October 9, 2008 2:18 am
 pzigly pzigly
Kids will always go too far. U cant lock them up in a cage. Teens will always find a way and if you try to prevent them they will retaliate by doing something stupid that can leave them worse off. Its like a wild animal that has been locked up. When they find a way out they become crazier than usual.
October 9, 2008 2:59 am
 benz_man benz_man
I don't want to sound like someones father, but your opinion is somewhat juvenile. Think about this from the adult perspective instead of the child's. Of course kids will be kids and do all sorts or irresponsible things. But its the parents responsibility to do all they can to protect their child in the midst of their reckless abandon. And, no matter how you "feel", psycho-data has proven that loud music distracts a focused driver. At 80mph, you are traveling 117 feet per second. In less than four seconds, you've covered a football field. One second of attention loss is too much! Now imagine an inexperienced driver who is not only unfocused, but also "rebelling" in their new found freedom. The keyword in that sentence is "new".
October 9, 2008 5:23 am
 pzigly pzigly
When I was new driving. I loved it so much that I was never unfocused. I guess u can argue that people are different. I drove crazy all the time with the music loud, but I never got into an accident. I was so focused and excited to drive. And my 1986 4cyl buick only went up to 85mph. If I go past it, the speedo would start bouncing.
October 10, 2008 5:39 am
 Decypha Decypha
I agree; my reason for agreeing is that teenagers now will be the car market in the future. You don't want your market to view you in a bad light. If someone grows up having bad experiences with a particular car marker chances are that they will never buy a car from that manufacturer once they are in the position to do so. Ford's signing a death warrant for themselves. P.S. manufacturers did try that seatbelt system where the car wouldn't switch on unless your seatbelt is clicked in; people override that kind of system by connecting the seatbelt but placing it behind them.
October 8, 2008 7:29 am
 joelynn joelynn
Why is it limited to 80mph when thats (as far as I know) well over the speed limit in the USA? Isn't the limit 55? so they should be limited to that. Anyway would any kid who has a US Focus want to go street racing in it? It doesnt look to me like it has much street cred.
October 8, 2008 11:56 am
 pzigly pzigly
65mph in california. 75mph in some places
October 8, 2008 2:45 pm
 foose1397 foose1397
Ford stop stickin your damn money in the wrong places! Your design and quality is what is causing you not to sell your cars. If the only people you can sell to is first car owners that is pretty low standards. As for the idea....i don't mind the speed governor but the rest is ridiculous. First off any parent dumb enough to buy there kid a new car rather than used should pay for any repercussions. Kids are kids and need to experience being ridiculous with the music and friends in the car. It teaches them self control (something that no one knows about today). And really what is stopping the kid from taking your set of keys and making or buying a new copy (Ford keys are nothing special). I would deal without the phob for the price i could listen to music Lets put are kids in bubble suites before they go out to, it will protect them from bugs and people
October 8, 2008 12:07 pm
 YankeeDoodleDandy YankeeDoodleDandy
Can you elaborate on the quality issue with Fords'. I have a couple of mid 2000 Fords and have not had any significant trouble to date. What problems can I expect to have to deal with? Should I get rid of them? Is this all models?
October 8, 2008 5:50 pm
 pzigly pzigly
yes.
October 8, 2008 6:11 pm
 foose1397 foose1397
yeah sure...you may or may not have large trouble and ford engines and drive train are some of the more reliable however there is little to be desired as far as there design. When i talk about quality..it is that of body panel gaps, cheap plastic, and poor materials. They run fine (sometimes), and that is all i can say, they have no wow factor
October 8, 2008 6:48 pm
 YankeeDoodleDandy YankeeDoodleDandy
My vehicles are a taurus and a t-bird. I didn't buy the taurus for design more for functionality. I bought the tbird for a toy and like the looks as do many who give comments. am curious about the body panels poor fits as I guess i have never really looked that close. What should I look for and what problems will this cause? does this include my tbird as well as the taurus? What makes the plastic and materials as being cheap? Can you elaboarate?
October 8, 2008 7:23 pm
 pzigly pzigly
I was in a sport explorer that was no more than 1 or 2 years old. I think it was an 03 or 04 model. The first thing I noticed was lines in the faded leather and the paint on the door handle was all chipped up. If you gently touch the door handle with your finger nail it will start to peel. So ya I think thats cheap.
October 8, 2008 10:26 pm
 foose1397 foose1397
Yankee...The t-bird is a great exterior design however it stops there. The interior is from a Lincoln LS and some of the drive train parts are from it too, so it is not a true sports car. Look at both cars as they get older to have body panels gabs open and simple things like door hands and glove compartments come apart. Your t-bird will be better off however you taurus may see some aging. The biggest thing overall tho is the resale value is terrible and unfortunately these cars are hit or miss with problems (part of why the have the stigma of being terrible).
October 9, 2008 2:06 am
 YankeeDoodleDandy YankeeDoodleDandy
pzigly, that sounds like pretty serious stuff. I have a neigbour who has a similar problem with his toyota ala chrome flaking. Better stroke Toyota off the buying list as well. Have another neighbour with a 99 or 2000 civic which has become a rust bucket. Better stroke Honda off the list. Also have a fleet of GM trucks at work with cold start piston knock. Better stroke GM off as well. What should a person buy pzigly?
October 9, 2008 1:36 pm
 pzigly pzigly
Every car has problems. No car is imune. But Ford always had more of them. Friend just bought an F-150. First day it rained, the car's interior was soaking wet and he could hear water in the chasis swooshing around.
October 9, 2008 1:49 pm
 YankeeDoodleDandy YankeeDoodleDandy
Uh Yuh sure! sounds real. Should have told him to role up the windows next time it rains.
October 9, 2008 2:18 pm
 pzigly pzigly
Im not lieing here, there is a water leak somewhere. He tried to fix it with warrenty but they couldnt find it with the hose. Its a high truck they probably need to get it from the top. But he said every time he breaked or accel he could hear water swoshing. There is no point in lieing. Its not like im being paid. I actually like the new stuff that ford is bringing out, because it looks more stirdy, but I wouldnt buy anything before 2007. And I wouldnt buy any of the new models that havent been redesigned yet.
October 10, 2008 5:31 am
 9TNine 9TNine
Well, I can tell from the above that: some have kids, and some have no kids at all... So, question is: Is this a good idea? Depend on your kids (if you have any!) By the way: that is NOT a good looking Focus!
October 8, 2008 6:09 pm
 RS5 RS5
I don't think any kid would be willing to put themselves through the shame of being seen in that car in the first place. Then again, the kid would just choose to buy another car. Stupid move ford.
October 8, 2008 9:08 pm
 Joe_Limon Joe_Limon
See, therein lies the genius. No kid can afford a brand new car (well maybe a new pontiac wave or chevy aveo, if they've been saving for a long time). So here is an option given to parents, they can buy their kids responsibility. And still feel as though they have some power over their kids actions. It has absolutely nothing to do with what the end user thinks of the car.
October 9, 2008 4:01 am
 YankeeDoodleDandy YankeeDoodleDandy
Foose1397, I didn' buy my tbird as sports car nor do I think Ford ever promoted as such. Not sure why the comment. Can you elaborate on what you are getting at? Don't all manufacturers share body parts among their models? I guess I don't understand why it should bother me that my tbird has some lincoln parts in it. Can you enlighten me on that one? I am familiar with at least a dozen taurus or sable or 500 ownerships and to be honest have never heard a complaint from any other than one having some electrical problems with windows and another with some premature brake wear problems. That s one of the reasons why I have purchased Fords. Frankly the only manufacturer that I have heard negative comments about from any of my socials is Toyota. Even those comments were trivial other than the weak and rusting truck frames.
October 9, 2008 1:53 pm
view more comments