BMW Mulling Over 1-series Based Z2

BMW 1 Series Cabrio
BMW 1 Series Cabrio

Add a Comment

Comments (33)

 alessandro alessandro
Nice one. MB, Renault and Citroen are probaly on same tracks with their new A and B-classes, Alpine and GT. Something close is coming from Audi, Peugeot, Saab, Opel, WV and Ford. It will be a resurrection of a segment we are talking about.
September 19, 2008 1:14 pm
 Pentium Pentium
I think it will be good :)
September 19, 2008 1:19 pm
 Emrys_Myrddin Emrys_Myrddin
Hope they remember to do a coupe version... BMW is missing a small 2 sits coupe.
September 19, 2008 4:19 pm
 IpsesNipse IpsesNipse
BMW has the 1series coupe. Its may not be a two seater but it sure is small. Then they have the Z4 coupe, its small and two seater so i cant just see your problem. And im sure it will come as a coupe too.
September 21, 2008 5:44 am
 Decypha Decypha
I hate this car; the 1series coupe that is. The only part of the hatchback that I didn't mind was the back, they then took a hyundai-e rear and mated it to the ugliest part of the hatchback.
September 19, 2008 4:31 pm
 joshg_5 joshg_5
You speed words of wisdom my friend. You're absolutely right.
September 19, 2008 9:39 pm
 Xanavi23 Xanavi23
That would be awesome.
September 19, 2008 10:44 pm
 Xanavi23 Xanavi23
*if its not ugly. So far the only BMW i really like is the M3(new) and the X5 is okay.
September 19, 2008 10:46 pm
 motorsport13 motorsport13
the same here i only like the m3 and x5, for me bmw died in the 04 when they started focusing on useless technology instead of what it really matters. my fav car is the bmw m5 but the e39 but the new one is just BS why cant bmw make an outstanding car instead of a fugly convertible
September 19, 2008 10:53 pm
 Xanavi23 Xanavi23
The 5 series isn't bad...but its not great. I love the mechanics of the car, very fast, agile and well built depending on model 535i and+ but the looks specifically the front headlights have always been a bit weird. I agree though, the E39 was a GORGEOUS car and still is. Also remember the 7 series from 2 generations ago ? I forget the Code but it ended production in like '00. Another gorgeous clean car that lost some good looks. The 7 series is finally starting to look pretty good, but it took a while and 1 weird design to get over.
September 20, 2008 10:54 am
 CheeseGrinder CheeseGrinder
Obviously they're trying to dominate the auto industry...DUH! Thats the idea. You can hardly call BMW's crap...unless you've had no experience besides looking at pictures. As for competition for the R8, are you forgetting the M6? which absoultely hammers the R8 performance wise. The Z8 was a niche concept model with only a handfull built and was never meant to be a mass produced model. If you ever take the time to go and have a look at an X6 and drive one you would quickly find out what all the fuss is about and realize that they're an awesome drive and a car the belies its size with its dynamics. Cheap low end POSs????? I feel sorry for you.
September 19, 2008 11:52 pm
 RS5 RS5
How selfish a motive is that? to dominate the auto industry and force all others out of business. Did you see the article a couple of days ago about Ford's goodwill in acknowledging GMs 100 anniversary? Obviously Ford isn't as selfish as BMW if that's the case. Not everybody in the world wants BMWs, and I happen to be one of those people. No matter how well the X6 drives, I can't see the point in the car. It's pretty damn ugly to start with and then of course its a four door coupe. Probably just exists to create a new niche so BMW actually has something to be proud of for a couple of days. Not all people buy a car because it has good dynamics for its size, if you haven't figured that out yet. And you seriously think an M6 is up to par with the R8 in terms of performance. First of all, it doesn't look nearly as coherent and stunning as the R8, and second of all, I didn't see the M6 win any Car of the Year awards, which the R8 did. The R8 was praised by literally every single car magazine and review out there for its drivability and performance. The M6 was not. And can you seriously compare an M6 to a Z8 or an 8 series when both were actually being produced? An M6 is just a jacked up 6 series. The R8 is a completely unique car. By the way, who started the whole thing with diluting the brand? The the North America, when the X3 came out a couple of years ago, many people were surprised because BMW stooped so low in the spectrum. Obviously Mercedes and Audi had to compete so years later they came out with the GLK and Q5. Now BMW is in the development of a X1. That's just revolting to me. And a 1 series? I don't see anything from Mercedes and Audi to compete with that here. Why? Probably because both companies realize that maybe brand name and reputation is kind of important? Why don't you see $40,000 cars from Rolls Royce, Ferrari, Lamborghini, Maserati, Bentley...? Probably because they see more to a car company than profits. They realize the importance of a long standing name. BMW is all about profits and dominating the car industry. No matter how well BMW can build a car I know that many people out there, I being one of them, will never buy a BMW just because of what it is lowering itself to. You see the new 7 series? butt ugly. go to the article on this website. read the comments. majority speaks. its UGLY. that's what happens when you focus on POS crap cars like the 1 series, X1, X3, X6, PAS (whatever the hell that's supposed to be), you name it. I miss the good old days of the Z8, non ugly 7 series', and 8 series. I actually liked BMWs back then. You think BMW would've even thought about having X1 and 1 series cars back then? If they did, we probably would've seen them. Just as much as you feel sorry for me, I feel as sorry for you because apparantly, you're one of the many people BMW has brainwashed into taking its new direction seriously. Shame on BMW.
September 20, 2008 1:59 am
 dom6698 dom6698
Purpose of most companies: to make profit. Purpose of anti capitalists: to be nice. If I were BMW and I could make money doing 116Is and 320Is I wouldn't be that bothered about an Audi which is a jumped up V-dub. For every cheap car BMW makes there is another Audi or Mercedes-Benz. A3 1.6 8V or 1.9 TDI? A4 1.8 TFSI 120 or 2.0 TDI 120? Jumped up Golf? V-dub engines? Stupid grilles? Higher tax? Lower fuel economy? Go away and hide somewhere before you begin to look like an out of control weirdo loser. And by the way, Rolls Royce don't make a $40k car because it would damage their image, not because they wouldn't sell. The brand would lose its exclusivity and value. Oh, and Ford wouldn't pee on GM if it were on fire, they just have to exchange niceties so as to remain united in the US auto industry. Its called keeping your enemies close. You make it sound like 'oh Ford i love you so much. I'm soooo sorry we've been fighting over sales for the last century. We'll stop making cars so YOU can have all the market' life ain't like that. How old are Audi engines anyway? the 1595cc petrol 4-banger traces its roots back to 2000 and way before. The 1896cc diesel 4-banger dates to 1989. And can Audi build its own V10 engines? No, it has to go running to Lamborghini. Can Audi make a decent normally aspirated petrol engine? No. BMW can. Do Audis have stop and start and therefore emit less? Is Audi your secret lover? Or are you just in denial? And by the way I prefer Renaults.
September 20, 2008 10:24 pm
 RS5 RS5
As you said, Rolls Royce doesn't make $40,000 cars because it would ruin their brand image and exclusivity. You don't think the same applies to BMW producing 1 series/ X1 cars, while coming out with 7 series's and X6's that look like crap (in my opinion)? BMW had much more exclusivity before the X3/1series/X1. Audi my secret lover? grow up man
September 22, 2008 2:50 am
 CheeseGrinder CheeseGrinder
That rant was in reply to RS5
September 19, 2008 11:53 pm
 Decypha Decypha
RS5 has a point; BMW cars are ugly nowadays, only a few actually look decent. How much harder is it now to defend a BMW? Admit that it's very hard to justify their good drive-trains when the piece of metal staring back at you wouldn't look out of place in a sewage pipe. As a BMW fan it's been the hardest thing to admit; I could have always said that Audi's don't drive as good but they've now officially knocked that ball out the park.
September 20, 2008 3:41 am
 TSLi TSLi
RS5 You are obviously an Audi fan boy who is trying his utter hardest to put BMW down at every hurdle. But unfortunately you seem to have forgotten the fact that the chiefs of BMW will never look at this forum. And even if they did they would see your comments and laugh. You my friend need to learn a thing or two about running a business before you start bitching. Do you really think a company can survive solely on making high performance vehicles? If you would pick up a newspaper, even turn on your TV or radio you will hear and see that we are experiencing an economic downturn. The price of petrol has increased and countries such as the UK are making it very difficult for owners to enjoy a powerful car these days. Oh, but Mr. RS5 here thinks that Bentley, Rolls Royce and Lambo do not make $40,000 cars, so why should BMW? Are you serious? Just think for 1 second about who owns Lambo and Bentley..... Audi and VW. What cars do VW make? Power crazy road cars? No. Polo, Golfs, and Passats. BMW are one of the very few companies out there today that are not owned by some mass-producing car giant. So do forgive them for trying to make smaller, easily sellable vehicles during a recession to continue making a profit, whilst still making each and every car in their range a focused driving machine. That is business genius! As far as the complaints towards the look of the cars go, please forward them to the financial accounting department of BMW AG. They will happily slap you out the building. BMW didn't get where they are today by making boring saloons with a nice and safe 4wd system, while placing a massive V8 under the bonnet, expecting it to go fast. BMW is innovative. Audi copy the competition and finally have the R8 thanks to Lamborghini. No matter how a BMW looks, they will always have my respect. They are different.
September 20, 2008 9:45 am
 RS5 RS5
Yea and what if I happen to be an audi "fanboy". And watch your language, it just shows how idiotic a person you are, not able to have a proper argument without using profanity. You actually think I intend BMW to read this forum? What are you a mind reader? Well if you are, you suck at it. I'm just arguing my point. And how long has BMW been around. They've been around when the economy's been just as bad. And I've never seen 1 series cars and X1s in BMW's history. You think they just got up one day and said "oh the economy stinks so lets make cheap crap vehicles like the X1 and 1 series while neglecting our high end cars so we can make a living"?. I don't think so. Plans for the X1 and 1 series were announced BEFORE the economy's downturn. And you still didn't address my issue of ugly cars like the 7 series and X6. BMWs are UGLY. Just accept it. People don't like ugly cars. simple as that, although you may have a hard time getting that through your thick skull. Call me an audi fanboy. not like you aren't a BMW fanboy.grow up and face the facts. And you don't think BMW copies competition. Go learn something about cars and get back to me on that.
September 20, 2008 8:54 pm
 Joe_Limon Joe_Limon
TSLi's argument wasn't riddled with profanity. Aside from the word bitching, which in all honestly you were doing, his argument hasn't sunk to the levels which you so describe. I like some Audi's, and some BMW's. I have to disagree with everyones comments towards pretty much every newer bmw, imo they finally have style and aren't boring box shaped cars anymore. The same goes with Audi. RS5, the one thing that strikes me about your argument is that you don't believe BMW should make a segment filling car. From my knowledge, Audi is another one of the most blunt segment filling car companies in the world. Most non german car companies are creative and can come up with inventive model names, but the German cars come out and say how each car compares to it's siblings. Thus it can be argued that every car they create is a segment filling car created solely to capitalize and make the most in today's market. Your arguments, are they perhaps last ditch measures to strike out against what you fear? Your favorite car companies most major competitor making a decent financial move?
September 20, 2008 10:02 pm
 Xanavi23 Xanavi23
Well said TSLi. I think the 1 series is still a very good idea, the only problem is its execution. Its too close in price to the 3 series which tempts buyers to just spend a bit more and get a 3er and while i think the styling is okay, the front is still a bit weird. Its a great car IMO, but the execution was a bit flawed.
September 20, 2008 10:59 am
this is for RS5 and those bmw haters; it is really pathetic when you rant and rave like you have done; pathetic. Two facts for you; 1) even though not everyone buys a car because it is dynamically good for its size- bmw's rivals have been trying to steal the ultimate driving machine's mojo because they realise how unique and different it makes their product -the R8 and RS4 are two good eamples, would they really be any good if they only looked good and were well built?? NO WAY. 2) BMW does not follow the pack otherwise it wouldnt be BMW it would be Audi, Audi has VW/LAMBO engines and switchgear BMW is BMW. educate yourself; if BMW had stuck itself in its past only making cars it made 50 years ago it would be irrelevant; if BMW werent so unique they would have given us a jacked up Mini for a 1 series much the same way the A3 is a Pimped up Golf, no sir, instead we got rear wheel drive and stand out styling, and its a hit.
September 20, 2008 11:09 am
 TSLi TSLi
RS5 Thank you for your response. I don't recall using any profanity in my last post.. If you're talking about the expression 'bitching', then let me assure you it is nothing more than an informal verb used to describe or express displeasure or a grumble. I went to school too you know! Again thank you for agreeing with my point about the whole fanboy issue. Yes, I probably do suck at mind-reading and once more, thank you for bringing that do everyones attention. Right, back on topic. Allow me to give you a quick history lesson RS5. The most recent great recession experienced around the the world was The Great Depression. This began in 1929 on a day we now know as Black Tuesday. Amongst the whole world, Europe was affected the worst mainly due to the effect of World War II. Now, would you like to guess when BMW first started producing automobiles? 1928 Something tells me that BMW hadn't even thought of the letter M// let alone begin to contemplate the need of a small hatchback SUV crossover. I reckon that is why, RS5, you have not seen cars like the X1 and 1 series before. Between then and now the world economy has seen a massive incremental INCREASE up until 1999. BMW became a success like you say through making high performance saloons and M cars during this time as people could happily afford them. However, it was actually since the year 2000 that the western world has seen stock markets slowly level off and eventually downturn while places like China and India have thrived. Now, again YOU would like me explain why are BMW neglecting their high end cars with the 1 series? Maybe you havent seen the M3, M5, M6, Z4M, X5/X6M, M1 hommage being released? I also read that the first 4 are pretty good against their rivals! Wow.. neglecting hey? I can only ask you to go and have a look at Audi's history. Why is it so wrong for BMW to make a car that Audi have been making since 1996? (i.e. the A3) What the hell was the A2? And the upcoming A1? Ok, Audi is not on trail here is it.. If BMW stopped making the 1 series and Mini, trust me when I say they would have a much smaller mark on the automobile map today. Just have a look at their yearly sales figures for each model. If the economic downturn were to continue on its path today and swiftly make a lot of rich folks poor, what cars do you think they will buy? A ML? A Q7? A X5? A nice new RS6? NO TT? SLK? Z4? NO A X1, cheaper than the above and better on fuel? YES. A Z2, as above but better to drive that rivals? YES I happen to like the X6 in its real form. Looks very aggressive, and I have yet to see a 7 series in person so i shall reserve judgement on that. Am I a fanboy, yes I probably am. But the difference between me and you, RS5 is that I can happily back up what I write, whereas you have an unearthly urge to announce the 'thickness of my skull' and then ask me to reply. Sorry WCF to rant on like this, but I like to correct people when they make silly remarks without thinking. Enjoy your read! :)
September 20, 2008 10:10 pm
 Joe_Limon Joe_Limon
Short comment on the depression. During the great depression more millionaires were made then in any other point in history. Money doesn't just disappear, it just changes hands, and in the case of a depression it went into the hands of the wealthy, leaving a depression among the poor. One would never call a point in history where all the rich people lost all their money to the poor a depression. I guess what I am saying is that even though the market may tumble and fall in the upcoming years, there will always be wealthy people buying expensive cars.
September 21, 2008 4:29 pm
 Bori Bori
i don't but i'd rather buy a mazda MX-5 (miata) instead of the Z2, nowadays when you buy a BMW you´re paying for the badge and the so call technology, the design is ugly not saying the price...while the miata might look girly or not even agressive but for the price you have a decent car and not to mention mazda have improve their looks and quality during the last years.
September 21, 2008 2:45 am
 TSLi TSLi
I understand where you are coming from. The MX-5 is a great car. But if you read the article it will fill the premium segment roadster niche, rather than going head to head with the mazda. Besides, if you want to talk quality then although the Mazda has improved, it is still nowhere near to its rival at Mercedes, BMW or Audi. I talk from experience as I went to see one when it was updated. So even if you would rather buy one over a Z2, a lot of wealthy 'daddys' would want their daughter to only ride in the best. :D Its sad that people look at the badge first, then the car.
September 21, 2008 9:45 am
 Decypha Decypha
TSLi, by your argument I gather that we should expect something of a 0.5-series; maybe something that competes with the VW Polo? no, better yet something that competes with the Tata Nano maybe and while their at it BMW should just make a 9-series to take on Bentleys as well. Look, since you brough VW up, VW learnt first hand about brands; trying to sell in a market that your brand isn't associated with might do more damage than good in the long run; i.e. VW Phaeton. There is a reason BMW bought Mini; Mini, or something else in the same vein should be the "lower-spectrum manufacturer" in the same way that Audi is basically VW-premium; VW handles the "normal" car market, Audi handles BMW and Mercedes territory, mostly anyway, Bentley is super luxury etc... it makes business sense because you can penetrate a certain market without damaging your personal brand. Personally, I would like the 1-series if it didn't look the way it did from the front; all I'm saying is that I'm sure it took the same amount of effort to make the awkward looking front as it would have taken to make it look presentable at the very least. See with cars, unlike (to a greater extent :D) with humans, you can actually pick what it looks like. To me, the 1-series should have looked better... they have the rest of the formula working for them, I think it wouldn't be too much to ask for for them to look the part as well.
September 21, 2008 8:28 pm
 TSLi TSLi
You make a compelling argument Decypha, so it should not be revoked - this is a public forum. However, I was only trying to get the point across that BMW should not be 'bashed' for releasing a small car, as it seems that readers on this site have more of an issue with BMW - an issue that goes beyond the look of their vehicles. True, Mini competes with the Polo to a certain extent, but lets keep it on BMW. Would it be a bad idea for BMW to compete against the Tata Nano, yes it would. This article is only about the possibility of a 1 series sized, 2 seater roadster and that is where my argument ends. The 1 series picks up what the old 3-series compact left off. Just because they changed the model name to distinguish it from the rest of the range makes its purpose no different. A Golf, A3, Merc CLC rival. Before you get too sure about Audi being the premium VW, don't forget the new A1! Yes the looks cause controversy. You like many others do not like the look of the 1 series, whereas others do not like the 7 series, or 3 series, 5 series, etc... and that is personal opinion. I hate the X3, for example. But controversy causes interest, which turns into attention which = sales! That in my opinion is rather clever. Besides the 1 series does sell well if I'm not mistaken. Had the 1 series looked better, been like a miniature lamborghini I dont think it would have made a damned bit of difference to the sales figures. BMW does not make beautiful cars, thats not really their unique selling point.
September 21, 2008 11:12 pm
 Decypha Decypha
and excuse my argument if it sounds a little scatter-brained, I'm kind of disorientated at the moment... I do know that Rolls Royce is BMW's ultra-luxury arm but I'm hoping you understand the gist of my argument anyhow.
September 21, 2008 8:39 pm
 Decypha Decypha
lol maybe I should learn not to argue when I feel like this. I revoke my statement...
September 21, 2008 8:52 pm
 Decypha Decypha
Okay I see your point; I guess I'm just trying to fill my own need to feel like BMW is all over their competition, not just in engines and dynamics, but in looks as well. I never quite thought of it like that. lol it's kind of hard thinking like that when you're surrounded by Audi and Merc fans who never fail to remind you about BMW's shortcomings.
September 22, 2008 5:10 am
 caraddicted caraddicted
the difference between bmw's and all other carbrands is that they make their car look better then in real life and bmw do not ,.... when i first saw the X6 photo's i thought it was so ugly but when i saw it face to face in real life everything changed,same for the 1'series,at the end you will know that the old lengend did not fall
September 22, 2008 11:27 am
 Targa_Florio Targa_Florio
For those who think the spirit of BMW lies in the luxury, you are totally wrong. The spirit of BMW used to come from bringing sports cars to the people. Not in terms of price, obviously :-), but in terms of practicality: their models were two cars in one, sports + sedan, for the price of a big one. The remaining part of that spirit is the exclusive use of Rear-Wheel Drive, which is even more quintessential for a roadster, along with lightweightness. Thus I do think it's going to be a very and honest car (if there aren't too many heavy gadgets in it), a bit better and a bit more expensive than the MX-5
September 22, 2008 1:16 pm
 caraddicted caraddicted
the difference between bmw's and other carbrands is that they make their car look better in the photo's than in real life and bmw do not....*
September 22, 2008 1:50 pm