Kicherer get to Work on Mercedes C-Class 320 CDI 4Matic

Mercedes C-Class 320 CDI 4Matic by Kicherer
Mercedes C-Class 320 CDI 4Matic by Kicherer
Mercedes C-Class 320 CDI 4Matic by Kicherer
Mercedes C-Class 320 CDI 4Matic by Kicherer
Mercedes C-Class 320 CDI 4Matic by Kicherer
Mercedes C-Class 320 CDI 4Matic by Kicherer
Mercedes C-Class 320 CDI 4Matic by Kicherer
Mercedes C-Class 320 CDI 4Matic by Kicherer
Mercedes C-Class 320 CDI 4Matic by Kicherer
Mercedes C-Class 320 CDI 4Matic by Kicherer
Mercedes C-Class 320 CDI 4Matic by Kicherer
Mercedes C-Class 320 CDI 4Matic by Kicherer
Mercedes C-Class 320 CDI 4Matic by Kicherer

Add a Comment

Comments (11)

newest first oldest first

norther

this looks nice. if onlu mercedes could get 265 out from that 3.2. in my opinion that 3.2 is so outdated. they should either scrap it, or replace it.

August 29, 2008 3:42 pm

report abuse | reply

MAB

I thought Benz did away with the 3.0 CDI in the C-Class in favor of the Bluetec diesel when the model changeover happened? Neither diesel is available here in the US in the C, (and neither is the wagon), so forgive me for being behind.

August 29, 2008 4:37 pm

report abuse | reply

1 reply

norther

yes MAB...i forgive you.

August 29, 2008 7:21 pm

report abuse | reply

benz_man

Wow, every C350 interior should look this good. Mercedes is asleep at the wheel.

August 29, 2008 5:36 pm

report abuse | reply

trevor-k

I love the new c-class but the estate is just ugly, they need to take a book out of audi's book on how to style an avant.

August 30, 2008 6:22 pm

report abuse | reply

1 reply

Joe_Limon

I agree, its a dodge magnum with a mercedes grill on it.

August 31, 2008 5:23 am

report abuse | reply

IpsesNipse

the 0-100 in 6,7 aint that impressive. The 535d goes as stock in 6 seconds and its a quite alot bigger car. So why is the chipped merc engine so lazy.

August 31, 2008 4:16 pm

report abuse | reply

SD-AMG

First of all its a 3,0 litre engine! Second, it is by far better than any diesel Audi/VW ever produced!

August 31, 2008 9:32 pm

report abuse | reply

1 reply

norther

3.0....or 3.2, it still sux. it is a 3 litre and its name is 320 cdi? once again mercedes` originality and creativity pales in comparison with ...with...vw..audi..bmw..hell even god. they are so smart they even name the AMGs 60, 62, 63, 65 ... but they all have 6 litre engine. or just like in the case of the new C class. C200, 220 and 250. but in fact, it is a 2000 cmc. as far for the pathetic 320, if it is better than audi/vw, how come it produces only 224bhp, compared to audis 240bhp. of course the power alone doesent makes it better. but come on... everyone knows that vw engines are pretty much bullet proof. and much cheaper and ergonomic, economic that a mercedes engine. until the last 320 was repalced, that was a 3199 cmc, with 206 or 216 bhp? damn... ask urself if that amount of power and cc's diserve the taxes. one day ull become a great mathematician bro.

September 1, 2008 10:22 pm

report abuse | reply

IpsesNipse

first of all the 535d is a 3.0 litre not a 3.5 as you think second of all Audi has always had the best diesel engines and still have. They might not be thee most powerfu of all engines but they are cleaner and more eco friendly than any other so dont rush ahead of things just cause you are not awear of things. LOL just that you think the 535d is a 3.5 litre and not a 3.0 litre just shows how little you know about things

September 1, 2008 2:55 am

report abuse | reply

IpsesNipse

The 63 amg is Actually 6.2 litre and diesels are often named as a bit higher if they have turbos or something like it. Like the BMW 318 is actually 2.0 but its been detuned and the 323 is the same engine but with a higher output. Quite simple

September 2, 2008 2:47 pm

report abuse | reply