First Images of 2010 Cadillac SRX Crossover Released

looks like a modded saturn vue... and it probably is underneath considering its a GM i like cadillacs, but damn this is pointless....fine its made to compete in the market, but seriously, how much competing can you do nowadays with gas prices so high. People are looking for smaller, more efficient models.

I miss the older model. This one looks like it was made and designed by a company from china.

I like this a lot, it looks like an SUV version of the highly successful CTS, while also staying true to the Provoq concept, and since its a crossover it should fare better than the Escalade in sales. And yes, its built on a shortened version of the Outlook/Acadia/Traverse frame, meaning it should fare better in economy than those models due to its decreased weight and the fact that it uses the DI 3.6 rather than the standard V6 used in those models. That also means it probably won't have 3rd rowing seating like those models, but eh, kids are overrated.

You know, I kinda like this design. One handed applause from me, GM. Now, keep this trend going and design better cars.

I'm sure the SRX will appeal to more Americans than the CTS wagon but my choice is still the CTS.

oh joe lemon. you and your comments amuse me so much on WCF haha surprising that you'd actually compare a german made car to an american car, and still hold your head up high. They make much more efficient engines than the americans in terms of reliability, power, efficiency etc.., and it'll probably be like that for a very long time. Example regarding "gas mileage" Top gear episode on the audi A6 or A8 with a diesel V8 engine with two turbos. i'm pretty sure an american car with the same layout would NEVER make it there and back ..i think it was london and back but i'm pretty sure you know the episode i'm talking about... GMFAn... clearly by your name you are a huge supporter of General Motors and other american brands. Yes they have come a long way from what they used to be. However, i believe that european makes, and especially japanese makes are much smarter in terms of providing what the population wants. American's can be so full of themselves and they get affected by what they drive as well. Bigger the car, bigger the respect... bigger the engine, more respect... blah blah... i personally love powerful cars, but look what's happening around the world. You can't just ignore that sh*t ..its hurting the earth, all that CO2 is clearly hurting the ozone layer, but choose whatever you want to believe... i think u'll lean towards the ohhh nothings happening in the world everyhing will be fine. anyways...even with these 'smaller compact' models you two love soo much... sales figures clearly show that the europeans and japanese are winning and leading the way. and joe lemon... seriously man... you gotta get a life outta WCF. Almost every picture you have t argue with someone almost always lol. Let people speak their minds on here man and settle the fck down.

um it clearly shares cues with its smaller (and nicer) eurosiblings opel antara/chevrolet captiva, but lacks the design refinement you'd expect in a new caddy, maybe because it's built in mexico?? (always the greed and friggindamn profits in 1st...)

I'm 35 years of age and in my lifetime I've NEVER liked Cadillac's styling until recently. I think the most recent Cadillac's are actually pretty good looking cars (new CTS, XLR, STS). They aren't the gaudy, tacky land yatchs that I remember as a kid. At least you can say that they have their own distinc style now. Luckily the distinction doesn't make them tacky like it used to. Sadly, this is the closest thing that we have to real "American Luxury". So many other cars look alike these days. Seems like Cadillac has found a way to keep their cars distinct (which is what the styling used to be noted for in the 30s, 40s, 50s, 60s) but also new. Poor ol' Lincoln just seems lost. They're having a hard time moving their stlying direction from old to new and their products are not as good as these RWD platforms from GM.

And yes... after reading other comments... I can see architecture from other models sharing this platform, however, I think this is a car that will look much better in person than it does in pictures. Probably better looking in darker colors too.

I keep forgetting why I don't usually visit the comments section of this site. The continuous back and forth about how superior the U.S. is or how backwards it is gets boring. All most posters show when spouting their respective opinion is their obvious blind bias. Carcrazy1234, you seem so full of yourself when pointing out how superior Euro and Japanese cars are compared to American autos. And gmfan09 does not speak for all of America. Look at the sales numbers for smaller cars (on the increase) and our reduced miles traveled month after month. Obviously some of us "full of ourselves" Americans get it.

From the side profile view, there seems to be a great deal of visual weight ahead of the fron wheels. Is it necessary to have so much up front? Is there no way to have moved the front wheels a bit more forward (or the front of the grille a bit rearward) in the design? Head-on, the styling is stunning; and the character lines in the body sides are bold. When I glimse at a view of the rear-quarter view, I'm left thinking that the rear bumper seems to be too thin for all that boldness. I understand the desire to cut the visual hight of the car by adding matte black below a certain point, but the end result of this application makes the remaining important elements in the back of the car look too delicate. Thoughts?

god this thing is ugly! and just after we saw the pics of the CLS eastate and we were giving caillac praise...

Since last CTS the design language (hence no better terms to use) looks that brand prety neat. However SUV-s are not best part in the their lineup.

i luv it . one of the few good cars in americans . good job .

Very nice site!