Cadillac Escalade Hybrid Pricing Announced
Add a Comment
Login
Comments (68)
One of the most irrational and one of the worst cars I have ever witnessed
August 8, 2008 2:26 pm
There is enough space in the boot to fit all your dignity. You won't need any of it while driving this embarrassment.
August 8, 2008 2:31 pm
so now you can have a large luxury suv with better mileage then a small economy suv! Common sense move. That also being said, I'd like to see a 50% improvement in a compact car with the addition of a hybrid powertrain.
August 8, 2008 2:31 pm
Oh come on! All the American (c)rap stars love these cars! They have to be great!! /end sarcasm. This is a pile of junk. They'll might as well debut this vehicle being blown up and burnt to a crisp. Then for good measure, throw a hand grenade in there just to get rid of the debris.
August 8, 2008 2:52 pm
ha... no he's not lol as if ur a fan of this crap haha sad man sad
August 9, 2008 6:27 pm
Well in the city you get an improvement of 66.7% in fuel economy as the non hybrid gets 12mpg, on the hwy you get a 0.05% improvement. As impressive as the city consumption improvement is 20mpg is still crap, and 12mpg in the non hybrid is unexplainable in this day and time.
August 8, 2008 3:24 pm
The prickscalade. there is nothing good about that kind of cars even if they would have a tuned up hairdryer along to their superlazy V8. Anybody who buys one of those has some issues downstairs. I hate every one who can even picure themselves in a prickscalade, H2 or any of the sort. Cut the sales of the digusting monsters.
August 8, 2008 4:38 pm
The Americans will love this thing. All they care about is their status, and right now your no body unless you drive a hybrid, no matter if it sucks. This will sell out. I think GM is trying to sell cars and they know this will sell. End of story.
August 8, 2008 4:41 pm
Thats exactly what it is. Hence there is a Hybrid emblem or stick on every farkin panel. Most gaudy backward vehicle on the market, I would be emabarrased to be seen in one.
August 8, 2008 4:50 pm
honestly, we arent dumb enough to by that lead zeppelin, 71k so you can feel slightly better about yourself at the pump. rich people arent hurting with rising gas prices.
August 8, 2008 6:54 pm
no one here in the states is dumb enough to by that lead zeppelin. the dumb housewife in california might buy so that she could feel slightly more "economical" at the pump.
August 8, 2008 6:59 pm
lol at everyone criticising this vehicle, in the city it gets better mileage then every 2008 BMW, Every 2008 Porsche (save the 2.7L boxster and Cayman 5spd only not the 6spd), and every 2008 Mercedes (save the new ugly E320 bluetec). Haha and thats with it's "superlazy v8". And then there is the prick comments, lol who are you kidding, porsche mb and bmw owners are renown to be the most arrogant automotive enthusiasts in the world. And then you ppl go on to criticize this vehicle to being a pimpmobile which happens to be the furthest thing from an arrogant white buisness man, haha if you think about it, all them pimps also drive blinged out german cars as well. That being said, I like the looks of this SUV about as much as I do it's MB competitor... not very much at all.
August 8, 2008 7:09 pm
let me add that the 2.7L 5spd boxster/cayman get the same city mileage. While the E320 is a 3 liter turbo diesel and it gets only 3mpg better.
August 8, 2008 7:17 pm
Blanket statement there Joe! :) I have a 73.5 911T that I love dearly. I also own a 2007 BMW 328i. I make comments on worthless pieces of metal, aka The Crapscalade. This thing is an abomination and an afront to automobiles everywhere. Those "pimps" you mention that "bling out" German cars are much more likely to get one of these POSes than a German car.
I'd still like to see one of these explode into a million pieces, then urinated on to make a statement to GM on not building any more of this crap.
This is downright ludicrous. I do not even like the colours these bloody things come in.
August 8, 2008 7:15 pm
well, glad we agree on the horrible looks front. But that being said, GM has done a very impressive feat it has single handedly made it's worst fuel pig better then 97% of all german cars as far as city driving goes.
August 8, 2008 7:22 pm
Worldcarfans has the most ignorant and misguided posts of any car forum I have ever seen. Its ridiculous
August 8, 2008 7:22 pm
HA! Now, now - there are some who think they're being funny, like nurchus, but more than a few are actually knowledgeable.
While I appreciate the effort of GM with their dual-mode hybrid system, I think developing the system for an SUV initially was poor planning. For Cadillac, the system should have been developed in six cylinders and debuted in the second gen CTS first. Chevy should have been Malibu and Traverse, Saturn, the Aura and Outlook, etc...
But here in Beverly Hills I'm sure we'll see plenty of them around - the standard Escalades make up about 3 of every 5 luxury utes as it is.
August 8, 2008 7:52 pm
a 6 cyl hybrid escalade? why would gm neuter its full sized luxury hybrid in such a way? Hybrid technology should work as a complimentary feature, not so that you can downgrade you're engine size/power and end up with a economy car engine in a full sized suv.
August 8, 2008 8:48 pm
Buy a Mercedes GL diesel with much better mileage, higher tech and luxury, better brakes and all the way from Germany and it is still cheaper that a domestic brand
August 8, 2008 7:44 pm
The mercedes GL diesel gets 2mpg fewer in the city, and as far as emissions go, it produces more green house gasses then any other suv on the market. Which makes you wonder how they made there 3 liter diesel so inefficient. Higher tech my ass. I'll cite my source, http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/bymanu.htm
August 8, 2008 8:53 pm
I am averaging 27 mpg in town with less co2 emissions. The GL has a 7 speed transmission vs chevy 4 speed, second row side airbags with curtain airbags vs chevy curtain airbags with no side torso protection in the second row, also MB has strict roof strength standards that chevy and ford are fighting against in court now. If you notice how small the brake rotors are vs german you can see why stopping distances have been a problem with the Escalade and the small rotors look so silly with large wheels. Too expensive low tech
August 8, 2008 9:52 pm
The epa follows strick guide lines that do not try to pump out the most mileage out of each vehicle, that being said if you did have a hybrid escalade and drove the way you do (i.e. a pansy who barely uses the brakes he so covets). Then you would find yourself making over 30mpg. Also less CO2 emissions my ass, the hybrid escalade releases 9.2 tons a year, while your GL is 10.6 tons a year. And thats for the most fuel efficient model, if you wanted something with balls your gonna be putting out 13.1 tons a year at 13/17mpg... assuming again that if you had something with balls you would drive it like a normal person.
August 8, 2008 10:00 pm
Hey Eddie, Joe drives a 2002 GRAND PRIX. Spends his life on the forums dreaming
August 9, 2008 1:46 am
this is actually a pretty good idea. now we have a choice if we want a v8 or a hybrid =)
August 8, 2008 10:07 pm
It makes you wonder if the 6.0 hybrid could fit in another GM engine bay configured with enough space to handle it? The Holden/Pontiac G8 V8 hybrid would be a cool concept to see at Detroit: just to see how much farther the engine could propel a car without suffering from the weight of the Escalade. How about the new "BRX" with a choice of the 3.6 DI engine or the Hybrid V8 only. Or replace the Trailblazer SS with a hybrid V8 Acadia Denali (or Traverse SS)...
August 8, 2008 10:54 pm
ooohhhh yes...i've seen this. yeeyy, finally; a hybrid SUV from the yanks. it has a humongous, underpowered 6.0L engine, (which drains the whole oil reserve in the gulf of new mexico) and now they stuck a tiny little engine in the back..and there u have. an american HYBRID...pardon me, an SUV hybrid. the 50% improvement in the mpg, that's a fat lie. ok? excuse but i think the audi Q7 V12 TDI which also is a 6.0 L has a better mpg, andd hhaaaasss a lot more power. of course its not 70 grand, but they say it is luxury. i dont see anything luxorious at this piece of junk. what's so luxorius in having the gear stick at the steering wheel like a 40 year old WARTBURG (ps. if some of u don't now what a wartburg is, pls google it..especially u yanks). plus the outside looks like a damn brick. pls believe me, if this car would look nice, i mean really nice...i wouldn't care if it ran on diesel, petrol, gas, hybrid, ....urine...chineese slaves...but, it's not. im sorry, im really sorry it is not beautiful, it is not luxurious.
August 9, 2008 12:43 am








