Cadillac Escalade Hybrid Pricing Announced

Cadillac Escalade Hybrid
by Brian Potter
August 8, 2008 6:07 PM
Filed Under: American, Cadillac, Green

First revealed in Los Angeles 2007, Cadillac has announced pricing for its trendy 2009 Cadillac Escalade Hybrid. Proclaimed as the world's first large luxury SUV hybrid, the Escalade achieves 50 percent improvement in fuel economy, resulting in a somewhat uninspiring 20/21 miles per gallon (city/highway).

At a premium of $3,600 over a comparably-equipped non-hybrid Escalade, MSRP in the U.S. comes in at $71,685.

Source: GM
Press Release (Click to expand)

The launch of the world’s first hybrid applied to a large luxury SUV, the 2009 Cadillac Escalade Hybrid, begins this month. Achieving a 50-percent improvement in fuel economy in city driving, Escalade Hybrid arrives at Cadillac dealerships in the United States with an MSRP of $71,685. That represents a premium of only $3,600 over a comparably-equipped Escalade.

“In a changing marketplace emphasizing fuel economy technology, Cadillac is proud to be the only luxury brand offering a hybrid in this segment,” said Jim Taylor, Cadillac general manager.

Escalade Hybrid features GM’s advanced Two-Mode Hybrid technology, enabling EPA fuel economy ratings of 20/21 miles per gallon (city/highway). The hybrid system can operate the vehicle entirely on battery-electric power during idling or low-speed driving situations. Escalade Hybrid also incorporates Active Fuel Management technology that enables the Vortec V-8 engine to operate on only four cylinders in certain driving conditions to save fuel. Escalade Hybrid is offered as a total package, including nearly all available luxury and technical features as standard. The two extra-cost options are four-wheel drive and power running boards.

Subscribe to article comments
Receive an email each time a new
comment is posted to this article

Comments

SRT8
August 8, 2008 6:20 PM
Are they joking??

manels
August 8, 2008 6:26 PM
One of the most irrational and one of the worst cars I have ever witnessed

Bremen_Koenigsegg
August 8, 2008 6:31 PM
There is enough space in the boot to fit all your dignity. You won't need any of it while driving this embarrassment.

Joe_Limon
August 8, 2008 6:31 PM
so now you can have a large luxury suv with better mileage then a small economy suv! Common sense move. That also being said, I'd like to see a 50% improvement in a compact car with the addition of a hybrid powertrain.

Joe_Limon
August 8, 2008 6:32 PM
I still prefer the hybrid yukon in terms of luxury/looks.

Nurchus
August 8, 2008 6:52 PM
Oh come on! All the American (c)rap stars love these cars! They have to be great!! /end sarcasm. This is a pile of junk. They'll might as well debut this vehicle being blown up and burnt to a crisp. Then for good measure, throw a hand grenade in there just to get rid of the debris.

carcrazy1234
August 9, 2008 10:27 PM
ha... no he's not lol as if ur a fan of this crap haha sad man sad

radmeister
August 8, 2008 7:24 PM
Well in the city you get an improvement of 66.7% in fuel economy as the non hybrid gets 12mpg, on the hwy you get a 0.05% improvement. As impressive as the city consumption improvement is 20mpg is still crap, and 12mpg in the non hybrid is unexplainable in this day and time.

IpsesNipse
August 8, 2008 8:38 PM
The prickscalade. there is nothing good about that kind of cars even if they would have a tuned up hairdryer along to their superlazy V8. Anybody who buys one of those has some issues downstairs. I hate every one who can even picure themselves in a prickscalade, H2 or any of the sort. Cut the sales of the digusting monsters.

Sharpie
August 8, 2008 8:41 PM
The Americans will love this thing. All they care about is their status, and right now your no body unless you drive a hybrid, no matter if it sucks. This will sell out. I think GM is trying to sell cars and they know this will sell. End of story.

safrican
August 8, 2008 8:50 PM
Thats exactly what it is. Hence there is a Hybrid emblem or stick on every farkin panel. Most gaudy backward vehicle on the market, I would be emabarrased to be seen in one.

thamzn
August 8, 2008 10:44 PM
Escalade rocks. I want one.

KillerCane
August 8, 2008 10:54 PM
honestly, we arent dumb enough to by that lead zeppelin, 71k so you can feel slightly better about yourself at the pump. rich people arent hurting with rising gas prices.

KillerCane
August 8, 2008 10:59 PM
no one here in the states is dumb enough to by that lead zeppelin. the dumb housewife in california might buy so that she could feel slightly more "economical" at the pump.

Joe_Limon
August 8, 2008 11:09 PM
lol at everyone criticising this vehicle, in the city it gets better mileage then every 2008 BMW, Every 2008 Porsche (save the 2.7L boxster and Cayman 5spd only not the 6spd), and every 2008 Mercedes (save the new ugly E320 bluetec). Haha and thats with it's "superlazy v8". And then there is the prick comments, lol who are you kidding, porsche mb and bmw owners are renown to be the most arrogant automotive enthusiasts in the world. And then you ppl go on to criticize this vehicle to being a pimpmobile which happens to be the furthest thing from an arrogant white buisness man, haha if you think about it, all them pimps also drive blinged out german cars as well. That being said, I like the looks of this SUV about as much as I do it's MB competitor... not very much at all.

Joe_Limon
August 8, 2008 11:17 PM
let me add that the 2.7L 5spd boxster/cayman get the same city mileage. While the E320 is a 3 liter turbo diesel and it gets only 3mpg better.

carfan58
August 9, 2008 5:40 AM
Your so poor, just fill it when you need gas lemon

Nurchus
August 8, 2008 11:15 PM
Blanket statement there Joe! :) I have a 73.5 911T that I love dearly. I also own a 2007 BMW 328i. I make comments on worthless pieces of metal, aka The Crapscalade. This thing is an abomination and an afront to automobiles everywhere. Those "pimps" you mention that "bling out" German cars are much more likely to get one of these POSes than a German car.

I'd still like to see one of these explode into a million pieces, then urinated on to make a statement to GM on not building any more of this crap.

This is downright ludicrous. I do not even like the colours these bloody things come in.

Joe_Limon
August 8, 2008 11:22 PM
well, glad we agree on the horrible looks front. But that being said, GM has done a very impressive feat it has single handedly made it's worst fuel pig better then 97% of all german cars as far as city driving goes.

carfan58
August 9, 2008 5:55 AM
GM IS SO IMPRESSIVE THEY LOST 15.5 BILLLLLLLLLION.

VERY IMPRESSIVE

gmfan09
August 8, 2008 11:22 PM
Worldcarfans has the most ignorant and misguided posts of any car forum I have ever seen. Its ridiculous

MAB
August 8, 2008 11:52 PM
HA! Now, now - there are some who think they're being funny, like nurchus, but more than a few are actually knowledgeable.

While I appreciate the effort of GM with their dual-mode hybrid system, I think developing the system for an SUV initially was poor planning. For Cadillac, the system should have been developed in six cylinders and debuted in the second gen CTS first. Chevy should have been Malibu and Traverse, Saturn, the Aura and Outlook, etc...

But here in Beverly Hills I'm sure we'll see plenty of them around - the standard Escalades make up about 3 of every 5 luxury utes as it is.

Joe_Limon
August 9, 2008 12:48 AM
a 6 cyl hybrid escalade? why would gm neuter its full sized luxury hybrid in such a way? Hybrid technology should work as a complimentary feature, not so that you can downgrade you're engine size/power and end up with a economy car engine in a full sized suv.

eddie
August 8, 2008 11:44 PM
Buy a Mercedes GL diesel with much better mileage, higher tech and luxury, better brakes and all the way from Germany and it is still cheaper that a domestic brand

Joe_Limon
August 9, 2008 12:53 AM
The mercedes GL diesel gets 2mpg fewer in the city, and as far as emissions go, it produces more green house gasses then any other suv on the market. Which makes you wonder how they made there 3 liter diesel so inefficient. Higher tech my ass. I'll cite my source, http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/bymanu.htm

eddie
August 9, 2008 1:52 AM
I am averaging 27 mpg in town with less co2 emissions. The GL has a 7 speed transmission vs chevy 4 speed, second row side airbags with curtain airbags vs chevy curtain airbags with no side torso protection in the second row, also MB has strict roof strength standards that chevy and ford are fighting against in court now. If you notice how small the brake rotors are vs german you can see why stopping distances have been a problem with the Escalade and the small rotors look so silly with large wheels. Too expensive low tech

Joe_Limon
August 9, 2008 2:00 AM
The epa follows strick guide lines that do not try to pump out the most mileage out of each vehicle, that being said if you did have a hybrid escalade and drove the way you do (i.e. a pansy who barely uses the brakes he so covets). Then you would find yourself making over 30mpg. Also less CO2 emissions my ass, the hybrid escalade releases 9.2 tons a year, while your GL is 10.6 tons a year. And thats for the most fuel efficient model, if you wanted something with balls your gonna be putting out 13.1 tons a year at 13/17mpg... assuming again that if you had something with balls you would drive it like a normal person.

carfan58
August 9, 2008 5:46 AM
Hey Eddie, Joe drives a 2002 GRAND PRIX. Spends his life on the forums dreaming

BabyMilo
August 9, 2008 2:07 AM
this is actually a pretty good idea. now we have a choice if we want a v8 or a hybrid =)

MAB
August 9, 2008 2:54 AM
It makes you wonder if the 6.0 hybrid could fit in another GM engine bay configured with enough space to handle it? The Holden/Pontiac G8 V8 hybrid would be a cool concept to see at Detroit: just to see how much farther the engine could propel a car without suffering from the weight of the Escalade. How about the new "BRX" with a choice of the 3.6 DI engine or the Hybrid V8 only. Or replace the Trailblazer SS with a hybrid V8 Acadia Denali (or Traverse SS)...

RS5
August 9, 2008 4:30 AM
Anyone buying this car probably doesn't care about gas prices.

norther
August 9, 2008 4:43 AM
ooohhhh yes...i've seen this. yeeyy, finally; a hybrid SUV from the yanks. it has a humongous, underpowered 6.0L engine, (which drains the whole oil reserve in the gulf of new mexico) and now they stuck a tiny little engine in the back..and there u have. an american HYBRID...pardon me, an SUV hybrid. the 50% improvement in the mpg, that's a fat lie. ok? excuse but i think the audi Q7 V12 TDI which also is a 6.0 L has a better mpg, andd hhaaaasss a lot more power. of course its not 70 grand, but they say it is luxury. i dont see anything luxorious at this piece of junk. what's so luxorius in having the gear stick at the steering wheel like a 40 year old WARTBURG (ps. if some of u don't now what a wartburg is, pls google it..especially u yanks). plus the outside looks like a damn brick. pls believe me, if this car would look nice, i mean really nice...i wouldn't care if it ran on diesel, petrol, gas, hybrid, ....urine...chineese slaves...but, it's not. im sorry, im really sorry it is not beautiful, it is not luxurious.

Nurchus
August 9, 2008 7:36 AM
See MAB? Norther thinks alongside my POV as well on this POS. I'm not the only one being funny mate!! But I have to admit, you made me crack up. :)

I think what GM should have done with this good-for-nothing Crapscalade was make it a cross-over SUV like the trend of the market is headed. They are somewhat lighter, somewhat better gas economy (though not by much, but better than this hunk of junk), and they handle much better as well. But keeping the same design, weight, ugliness, no performance, appeal to the low-life (c)Rap stars and "gangstas" (shows you what kind of car this appeals to), barely any good technology aside from this attempt at a hybrid setup, is not going to make any sane person with an IQ above a doorstop get one of these.

If GM decided to at least put the bloody thing on a diet, made it look slightly more aerodynamic, better braking system, diesel engine (big if here), and actually made the damn thing look "intelligent", I'd take back my words. But this is a very weak and "cheap" way out to expand on a dying car lineup.

MAB
August 9, 2008 8:17 AM
Easy, sweetness, I didnt say I didnt share your POV on the car, because I do - I wouldn't touch an Escalade with your 3" stick. I just thought the tired, Bob Newhart-esque, pee on it, burn it, rappers blah, blah, blah mantra was getting pretty lame.

Back on topic - we can all agree that this vehicle is 100% marketing. It serves no purpose, and in the US market today it stands to drop 33.4% of its value at the moment it is driven off the lot, simply because its SUV vehicle class. Add the devalued state of anything in a truck class to the premium for the hybrid and its a tulip bulb for a foolish buyer.

sub39h
August 9, 2008 12:55 PM
i don't give a damn about the economy or the CO2 emissions of the thing... the production of the technology is MUCH more polluting than that of a standard car, and that renders the whole economy/emissions argument redundant. this is as it always was - a show off car for those lacking in the trouser department ;)

si1982
August 9, 2008 4:56 PM
thts the mileages as per the fed standards, whats the real world mileage like .... i think its just as pointless as the H2!

archytype
August 9, 2008 6:01 PM
Let's not foget 10 years ago this wasn't a big issue. and large SUV's couldn't be made big enough. Today driving new escalades is equivalent to Barack Obama driving a fiat convertible. Even it's nonhybrid epa of 12/20 equal to an Audi S5 with direct injection, and no one calls S5 owners bigots. Apparently it's time for American SUV buyers to switch to German lines, because somehow their designs seem deceptively lightweight and dynamic-and are bypassing the negative hype.

eddie
August 9, 2008 9:46 PM
If we immediately went to building cars primarily of carbon fiber we would immediately have significant improvement in mpgs and performance with decreased CO2 but the steel companies will not go for it just like the oil companies are not into finding other energy alternatives outside the oil thing. We need to think like there is another WWII and push alternative power and tell the oil bad guys in the middle east to try riding camels again and they will immediately have no POWER.

eddie
August 9, 2008 10:03 PM
Most Americans are concerned more with style vs safety and big SUVs are not too safe. During WWII when the president during that time wanted to build an Auto Baun in the USA, i.e. highways by the WPA he placed a speed limit in the USA because the USA cars were not as safe as the German cars. This continues today especially with the rapid increase in roll overs with the SUV market. Luckily the Germans and Japs are forcing the US for electronic stability control standard as well as better brakes and roofs able to support the weight of the vehicle. Have you ever seen an Escalade or H2 roll over .....what roof. Look at the corvette convertible, mustang convertible, sebring convertible etc. no active or passive roll bars. $71,000 for something that has crummy mileage, long stopping distances, handles crummy, and prone to roll over. NICE !!! Also as the big 3 were telling us bigger is safer, GM was selling small cars to the Europeans

Joe_Limon
August 11, 2008 6:08 AM
it is incredibly hard to flip a SUV, the early ones were only flipped when the drivers fell asleep at the wheel, realized they were driving off the road over corrected, over corrected again, and again until the shm amplified to the point that the vehicle flipped. As to convertibles like the corvette not having roll hoops. Have you ever seen a corvette flipped? no seriously, you would have to launch 2 wheels on a well shaped ramp before that would happen.

flyerbry
August 10, 2008 2:34 AM
You know, I love checking out this site for the car info and to see what is being developed for non-US markets. But as an American I have to say some of the comments here are completely ignorant of the facts and loaded with pointless generalizations. You folks make these comments like you have a clue as to what these vehicles are used for when you have never seen one up close. Why bother commenting on a vehicle that isn't even sold in Europe? Here's the deal... This is not, nor does it pretend to be a high-performance vehicle or sports car! To compare an Escalade to a Porsche or BMW (two brands I think we can all agree that specialize in high-performance) is just stupid.

As far as all the pimpmobile comments and name calling... I read these and two conclusions come to mind. The writer either detests those individuals out of envy because he/she doesn't have the income to drop the cash necessary to buy even one of the custom wheels rappers seem to like to handicap these vehicles with. Or the other, the writer is a juvenile without the intelligence to make a point without resorting to name calling. Either way, save us all the wasted time reading your comments. They are as stupid as the Escalade looks!

The problem with the Escalade is in the US you can purchase the very same vehicle with the same options and drivetrains without paying for the Cadallac badge (and gaudy styling) on the grille. GM sells these vehicles under the brands Chevrolet and GMC with nice leather interiors, exact same electronics packages and same towing capability. There is a place for vehicles of this size for people who need the towing capability and for those who need the seating for passengers and luggage so I can't fault those who buy them as long as they are using the vehicle for it's intended purpose. In a way, an Escalade used to pull a large boat or haul a large family is way more practical than a sports car and yet the enthusiasts on this site all oogle over the various sports cars despite their impracticality. The fact is every vehicle is series of comprmises and those made in the design of this type of vehilce are opposite that of a high-performance design. Call a spade a spade... These aren't excuses to justify the design, they are the facts. If I need to tow a boat I'm sure not going to visit a BMW dealer! If I used the same line of thinking some of you have used in your comments I should go on every crossover and performance car article and comment that the vehicle sucks because you can't tow with it. If I did my comment would be equally stupid as some I have read on this page. Personally, I'd much rather drive something smaller on a daily basis. The gas mileage on full-size vehicles is rediculous and even mid-sized vehicles need vast improvements in mileage. There isn't a single manufacturer today that builds a vehicle that is capable of both carrying a family of six or more that also gets good gas mileage. Hybrids are great if you don't need additional seating and have the extra money to burn on top of a typical vehicle purchase but beyond that you are paying for additional fuel economy at the cost of additional hardware. Not until hybrids offer plug-in capability will the added cost be worth the purchase premium. This is unfortunate because the environment will continue to suffer until prices drop and plug-in capability becomes available. I agree with the earlier comment that GM needs to be focusing on the midsize market where the public is now spending their money instead of these full-size, limited use tanks.

sub39h
August 10, 2008 2:59 AM
the Escalade is sold in europe, thank you very much ;)

sub39h
August 10, 2008 3:02 AM
and i reckon that a Mercedes GL, which is a similar price, will have better towing capacity with it's diesel engine and greater torque and it has seating for 7. it also has an interior comparable to an S-Class and it has better fuel mileage. if you're honestly trying to justify the Escalade as anything other than a showy purchase then it's you who shows no understanding of the car market

flyerbry
August 10, 2008 6:54 AM
sub39h...

I stand corrected. Never would have guessed the Escalade is sold in Europe. Can't imagine they sell many in that location.

Re-read my post. I'm quite in agreement that the Escalade is a showy purchase. The Cadilac Hybrid is $72,000 while the Chevy is around $50,000 and the only major difference is the looks and badging.

I checked MSN and the GL has a max towing capacity of 7,500 pounds where the Escalade is at 8,000. The hybrid, however, drops that to only 6,200. The only folks buying these are those with more money than sense.

Xanavi23
August 10, 2008 9:21 PM
Flyerbry...that was a hell of a post. I agree 100% this truck does serve a purpose although like you said, the smart choice is to just buy a Tahoe or Yukon. Especially since both of those are better looking, especially the Tahoe. As for this truck, its not great but at least GM is doing SOMETHING.

Xanavi23
August 10, 2008 9:22 PM
I agree 100% with your whole post, i meant**

carfan58
August 10, 2008 11:57 PM
some sour lemons are mad that the germans are winning the never ending car competition. its never going to end joey. we keep pulling further and further ahead. ever been on ANY autobahn? compare it to USA highway which has bumps, cracks, gravel shoulder, non reflective paint lines, pot holes, and crappier cars, worse drivers on it. very, very classless in USA unless you go to los angeles or so, but this is just one city.

RS5
August 11, 2008 2:01 AM
Go f*ck yourself you racist POS, and stop giving Germans a bad name with your idiocracy. And get a life. It's a wonder a ret@rd like you even learned how to type and use a computer. I'd bet you spend most of your time jerking off to nice German cars on the internet, but probably have never driven one your entire pathetic life.

Joe_Limon
August 11, 2008 3:23 AM
why would I be mad? I like european cars as much as I like american or japanese. BMW, Audi, Nissan, Mitsubishi, and GM are all top tier manufacturers in my books.

Joe_Limon
August 11, 2008 3:24 AM
as to crappy roads, American cars can handle rough roads better then "european tuning" it's part of the whole more forgiving suspension thing.

Xanavi23
August 11, 2008 5:18 AM
Joe, he doesn't know what hes talking about....Compared to Canadian roads, American ones are a damn dream. Our highways are pretty smooth(Can) but America still has a massively noticeable difference as soon as you cross the border in terms of smoothness and lack of bumps.

Joe_Limon
August 11, 2008 6:03 AM
Thats true, Florida roads=epic, and I love how there cars stay so clean!

Xanavi23
August 11, 2008 8:46 PM
You i remember a road-trip down to South Carolina...like riding on clouds man. Then on the way back...as soon as we cross the border into Canada, specifically Quebec....it begins....

Xanavi23
August 11, 2008 8:47 PM
**yea, i remember a roadtrip**

500lbman
August 11, 2008 6:24 PM
I sell Mercedes-Benz for a living in Texas. Here in Texas the GL320 CDI costs around $65k with good options included. The 2009 MB diesels with have AdBlue injection to make them 50 state smog legal, making them eligible for sale in California. Even other luxury car makers make better alternatives to the hybrid Escalade.

We take Escaldes in trade all the time here at the dealership and I have to say they are some of the fastest depreciating vehicles I have ever seen, as are all the domestic brands. It's not that they are not nice vehicles, but to pay over $70k for an alleged luxury SUV that is built on a chassis that was developed in the dark ages, with the same features you can get on and other GM products is just nuts.

The Mercedes-Benz GL tows relatively the same as the Escalade, but rides and handles like a dream, and the diesel version will hold it's value better then any other full size SUV. Check the pre-owned market if you don't believe me. I am sure the hybrid motor will help the resale value of the Escalade, but it will still be one of the worst depreciating vehicles, espcially when GM starts offering $10k rebates on the cars to get rid of them.

As diesels become cleaner, they are by far the best choice when cosidering cost of ownership, fuel ecomony, and going forward, being "green" when choosing your vehicle.

Joe_Limon
August 12, 2008 1:15 AM
Isn't the reason why the diesel GL gets good mileage stem purely from the fact that it has a 3liter engine vs the 6liter found in the Escalade? So it really isn't the diesel that's being green, its the smaller engine size. Also, in order to make the GL pass all 50 state smog requirements the exhaust gasses must be reprocessed. A very good technology in itself, but also one that decreases the overall efficiency of the vehicle, meaning that when the GL does become environmentally friendly, it is going to be getting poorer fuel economy and less power.

Joe_Limon
August 12, 2008 1:15 AM
Personally, I think a hybrid diesel would be much more impressive then any of the cars currently offered by any manufacturer.

carfan58
August 12, 2008 2:26 AM
on the way from MB lemon

Joe_Limon
August 12, 2008 7:15 AM
probably not, it's going to take a lot before the German pig headedness allows a non German technology to be part of there solution to a greener future. I could see some Japanese company bridging that gap first, then followed by GM, and finally maybe VW. Look at how long it took the Porsches to ditch there sway bar suspension way back when.

Joe_Limon
August 12, 2008 7:21 AM
haha after all, BMW for some reason is stuck thinking high reving large displacement naturally aspirated V10's will be the key to a greener future. No wonder the M5 and M6 get worse fuel economy then the non hybrid awd Escalade.

eddie
August 12, 2008 3:23 AM
My MB GL diesel has great acceleration with engine noise similar to a gas engine. You can literally stick you nose in the tail pipe and it does not smell like anything especially any diesel odor. Europe will be changing their CAFE standards to 45 mpg vs USA 35 mpg. That is why so many cars are diesels in Europe for their mileage and long engine life and reliability. It is amazing how many people you talk to in Europe that do not have driver licenses because of the cost and insurance of a car.

andy
August 12, 2008 5:01 AM
interior is still fuken ugly, this car gains nothing in its luxury class, better buy mercedes GL550 ..

Xanavi23
August 12, 2008 8:13 AM
Ultimitely i like the Tahoe/Suburban/Yukon the most when it comes to $50K and+ trucks. No im not saying they're the best...but when it comes to trucks, its hard to beat the the Original. Like Joe and others said, the Escalade is more expensive for no good reason...you can option out a Yukon VERY nicely and save alot of money over this. Also the Tahoe comes in a "Green"/hybrid build so thats cool. Its a good truck it drinks gas like water but it does its job with SHITLOADs of space and theres no shortage of power. However gas is expensive and GM will really need to think about how they can make these kinds of trucks even more efficient if they plan on continuing to sell them.

500lbman
August 12, 2008 7:44 PM
Joe,

Mercedes-Benz has already confirmed they will be first to market with a diesel hybrid in the S-Class. Do a google search for "S400 diesel hybrid". It will achieve 40mpg on the highway and produce over 450lb/ft of torque.

Joe_Limon
August 13, 2008 7:00 AM
they don't have any hybrid models on the market I bet it'll be pretty sketchy being there first one.

zzadamzz
September 11, 2008 5:25 AM
I am a unapologetic Escalade fan. I like the looks and size, just wish it were more affordable. The size and SUV features can be more than handy at times. And no, I don't like rap. E85 is readily available where I live; whatever you say about E85, it is great on emissions, and great for the american farmer. E85 extends engine life. All Escalades are flex fuel for 2009 (except hybrid).

View Comment Rules

Add Your Comment

You are modifying your comment

Existing Users

Username
Password
remember me on this computer

New Users

Username
Email
Password
Comment
Additional Images

Other links

Subscribe to WorldCarFans Newsletter
Please enter your email in the following box and click subscribe to receive our daily email