Mercedes-Benz Presents The Mean SL65 AMG Black Series

Top speed of 320 km/h; 661 hp

Mercedes-Benz SL65 AMG Black Series
Mercedes-Benz SL65 AMG Black Series
Mercedes-Benz SL65 AMG Black Series
Mercedes-Benz SL65 AMG Black Series
Mercedes-Benz SL65 AMG Black Series
Mercedes-Benz SL65 AMG Black Series
Mercedes-Benz SL65 AMG Black Series
Mercedes-Benz SL65 AMG Black Series
Mercedes-Benz SL65 AMG Black Series
Mercedes-Benz SL65 AMG Black Series
Mercedes-Benz SL65 AMG Black Series
Mercedes-Benz SL65 AMG Black Series
Mercedes-Benz SL65 AMG Black Series
Mercedes-Benz SL65 AMG Black Series
Mercedes-Benz SL65 AMG Black Series
Mercedes-Benz SL65 AMG Black Series
Mercedes-Benz SL65 AMG Black Series
Mercedes-Benz SL65 AMG Black Series
Mercedes-Benz SL65 AMG Black Series
Mercedes-Benz SL65 AMG Black Series
Mercedes-Benz SL65 AMG Black Series
Mercedes-Benz SL65 AMG Black Series

Add a Comment

Comments (60)

newest first oldest first

kevoluetion

HOT HOT HOT!

July 11, 2008 5:10 am

report abuse | reply

1 reply

I want! I want! I want!

October 29, 2008 5:28 pm

report abuse | reply

greenacre

check those fenders, they're HUGE!, ridiculously huge.

July 11, 2008 5:12 am

report abuse | reply

carcrazy1234

the rims look nice when spinning.... but not at standstill... i guess it'll grow on me though :P!! this this is one fat ass, kick ass car haha

July 11, 2008 5:17 am

report abuse | reply

ShinyG

Jaw to floor... Tongue unrolling on the floor like a red carpet... Instant headache from "cool Merc" concept hard to conceive... OMG, it's ridiculous! (in a good way)

July 11, 2008 5:18 am

report abuse | reply

Goldfinger

If that Black series on top gear was fast , what on earth will this be like?? SO damn sexy.

July 11, 2008 5:20 am

report abuse | reply

AG4

I'm not a Mercedes fan, but this one looks ok... Only problem is, why the heck does it still way so much? 1870 kg! Thats over 2 TONS!

July 11, 2008 5:32 am

report abuse | reply

4 replies

mps

How is a ton and 870 kg over 2 tons?

July 11, 2008 6:26 am

report abuse | reply

loyo

1870 kg CAN be over 2 tons: A metric ton (the one that everyone in the civilized world uses) is 1000 kg, a "ton" (in the US) is about 900 kg... so for the americans, 1870 kg is approximately 2 tons plus 70 kg (about 140lbs)

July 11, 2008 7:01 am

report abuse | reply

Frankorilla

to mps: dude... it's over 2 tons 1 short ton = 907.18474 kilograms

July 11, 2008 7:03 am

report abuse | reply

bakrione

but the metric ton is more commonly used

July 11, 2008 3:12 pm

report abuse | reply

Very cool...a bit of turbo tuning and this thing will blow away doors when it drives by...

July 11, 2008 5:43 am

report abuse | reply

sub39h

i think as far as the new shape SL goes, AMG have actually managed to make this one look good. that in itself is a more amazing feat than the performance of this thing. the only thing is that if the "standard" SL65 AMG costs £160k odd, then this will be priced to match the Lamborghini Murcielago and Ferrari 599 GTB and i'd put money of both of them being better cars to drive

July 11, 2008 5:45 am

report abuse | reply

3 replies

scuderia7

yeah i agree, the facelift really ruined the theme of the original styling but i reckon the wheel arches and especially the front bumper really make the facelift look sorted

July 11, 2008 7:34 am

report abuse | reply

scuderia7

and what's the go with 6 spoke wheels lately? they look good tho

July 11, 2008 7:42 am

report abuse | reply

scuderia7

and i like the back... the diffuser, the spoiler and the way it flows into the rear quarter panels... HOT! and whilst the c63 may be better value than this (remember that c63 black is ridiculously somuch more expensive than the regular c63) this just looks so special. it'll probably be the worse value for money sportscar. i'd really like to be able to drive both this and the slr and compare them.

July 11, 2008 7:57 am

report abuse | reply

Albe

That is one hell of a good looking car.I love the stance it looks mean!!!!

July 11, 2008 6:02 am

report abuse | reply

n1c0

It's not a roadster anymore! The roof is in one piece. WTF?

July 11, 2008 6:11 am

report abuse | reply

mc959

don't like those wheels, it's a bit too much of everything, the CLK black series is much more pretty, this car used too much steroïds!!!

July 11, 2008 7:07 am

report abuse | reply

pzigly

I thought it would be more special than this. There is no big improvement in this like the CLK black. With the perfomance of the CLK black equally comparing to this in the 0-60, I would save my money and get a clk black and it would porbably save more money on gas. I think they held back on this one to make the new SLR more special.

July 11, 2008 7:08 am

report abuse | reply

122

Not only was the power limited, They also had to limit the torque amount to 1000Nm. Mercedes said 1200Nm is possible.

July 11, 2008 7:44 am

report abuse | reply

ringi

"I'm not a Mercedes fan, but this one looks ok... Only problem is, why the heck does it still way so much? 1870 kg! Thats over 2 TONS!" So then its no problem, its under two tons?!!? hehehehe

July 11, 2008 8:06 am

report abuse | reply

burana800

Okay: 0-60mph under 4 sec, top speed 198 mph, very good looking! So please give it to JC and we will know how it handles.

July 11, 2008 9:56 am

report abuse | reply

GranTurismo

Still, it did't beat the Ferrari 599 in 0-60 time.

July 11, 2008 10:59 am

report abuse | reply

alessandro

Beautiful car. Idiotic torque and rear spoiler.

July 11, 2008 11:18 am

report abuse | reply

Xanavi23

Im in love with this car, Its an SL65 and while people might disrespect the power gains, it got something more important. It lost 5550KGs of weight, yea shes still a big girl....but with all that torque its gonna be easy to move it. Also this car dropped the hydraulic suspension so the handling should be incredibly better. I'ld buy it in a second, next to a GT-R and 911GT2 :)

July 11, 2008 11:39 am

report abuse | reply

smoothed front and dynamized end, they should make all SL look like this, despite the bumper kit.

July 11, 2008 11:58 am

report abuse | reply