2010 Chevy Silverado Heavy Duty Spied with Front End Changes
Suggest major mechanical revisions
-
2010 Chevy Silverado Heavy Duty Spied / AUTOMEDIA -
2010 Chevy Silverado Heavy Duty Spied / AUTOMEDIA -
2010 Chevy Silverado Heavy Duty Spied / AUTOMEDIA -
2010 Chevy Silverado Heavy Duty Spied / AUTOMEDIA -
2010 Chevy Silverado Heavy Duty Spied / AUTOMEDIA -
2010 Chevy Silverado Heavy Duty Spied / AUTOMEDIA
Add a Comment
Login
Comments (22)
carcrazy1234
i understood it just fine... he asked how much gas does it consume to the mile lol stupiddddd
July 3, 2008 3:29 pm
Spyshot-73
It is a figure of speech , instead of MPG with one of these it might aswell be gallons to the mile.
July 2, 2008 6:46 pm
Joe_Limon
It is a figure of speech you just made up. Vehicles that do measure mileage in Gallons per mile (such as yachts) would refer to it as "so how many gallons per mile does she take?".
July 2, 2008 7:18 pm
BabyMilo
it looks like all the other ones... you americans can probably tell the difference but i come from europe nd i cant
July 2, 2008 9:17 pm
DeleteThisAccount
"General Motors' heavy-duty pickups have to keep up with changing federal regulations"
6.6L Diesel, great improvement mates!
How can it haul anything with those shopping trolley wheels?
There must be a lot of farmers in America if every Moe and Joe manufacturer pops out 5 different "heavy duty" trucks, I know there are a lot of peasants...
July 3, 2008 5:46 am
josh1973
American automobile industrie is going to die. It's proven by cars like this.
July 3, 2008 7:21 am
alessandro
Everything is about to be extincted by active incompetence. Look at the European VW Scirocco or new BMW 7 series like things - same state, where new developments visibly enforced to be done below mediocrity to comfort ruling incompetence.
July 3, 2008 7:50 am
alessandro
I talking about the fact that most things in car industry as well are made below of average human culture ability.
July 3, 2008 9:52 am
alessandro
I'm talking about the fact that most things in car industry as well are made below of average human culture ability.
July 3, 2008 9:53 am
schrackensac
its a utilitarian vehicle meant to do utilitarian things. no it doesn't get great fuel mileage, no it doesn't set new benchmarks in aesthetic appearance, but it does do what its intended to do, and that's haul things the farming / ranching / construction industries need to keep soceity functional. the benefits and contributions far outweigh the negative impacts.
and LMS, there are a lot of "peasants" in america. we grow your food. you're welcome.
July 3, 2008 1:08 pm
alessandro
Aha, they deserve bland things because they are so important? It is vice versa, just people who make essential things for life, deserves best of that world have. From car design too. Their lives are made hard enough by logic of your kind.
July 3, 2008 5:32 pm
schrackensac
i don't know what you're arguing. its a pickup my friend. its a cab with a motor in front of it, and a bed at the rear. my logic is that you shouldn't judge it based on the same criteria you judge a passenger car or sports car on because its an entirely different use. apples to oranges. its like saying a crane is uglier than the GTR.
July 3, 2008 8:53 pm
DeleteThisAccount
I haven't seen anything yet a Toyota pickup 3.5 Diesel can't haul.
You try to rationalize the irrational, you don't grow our food, we don't import foodstuffs from the US other than Mike & Ikes.
No one needs this monstrosity, you should stop defending idiocy.
July 3, 2008 10:07 pm
alessandro
No,no. It is same thing like sport car, or bathroom, or building, or cofee maker, or bulldoser wich exsists hence they bears their (own) beauty an have so some inner, or human, or moral value. It is beauty of human creative ability itself, divinity if you like but things we do (and whole culture so), not exists on power of utilitary exuses. Nobody is trying to say that my welding unit or my showel should be beautiful like a fancy underwear but bridge ower river should be beautiful and truck for potato delivery too.
July 4, 2008 8:21 am
alessandro
And there is strait: Do not try to partonize people who feed you by pushing them idiotic uglyness. It is by the way a stalinist logic - they made this for real. Final result when human culture was displaced for excuse of purpose counts for the 90 million real human beeings killed, starved and tortured to death.
July 4, 2008 8:40 am
josh1973
Maybe GM should change its strategy from producing passenger cars to farming equipment... Seems to be their top competence!
July 3, 2008 1:55 pm
IndyDuramax
I have 2003 Duramax and get 18 mpg in town and 25 mpg on the interstates.I even get 11 mpg when towing my 34 ft. 12,000 fifth wheel.
January 28, 2010 11:30 pm
Share, rate & save
Latest Stories
Latest Photo Albums
BMW Zagato coupe
70 photos
2012 Worthersee GTI Fest
1
75 photos
Beijing Auto Show babes
5
31 photos
2012 New York Auto Show babes
5
13 photos
2012/2013 Audi A8 Hybrid
2
93 photos
Geneva babes
6
58 photos
BMW M550d xDrive
2
98 photos
Mazda Takeri concept
6
72 photos
Latest Videos
Volkswagen Golf GTI Cabriolet
Toyota GT86 driving dynamics detailed
Toyota GT86 design details
Toyota GT86 engine details
Audi e-bike in action
2013 Mercedes G 63 AMG trailer
2013 Audi RS4 Avant Trailer
Marisa Miller in Buick Enclave Commercial - behind the scenes
Chevrolet Corvette ZR1 to pace Indy 500
Nissan Juke R in Desert Nemesis short film
