VIDEO: GM's Ring Man Talks About CTS-V's N?rburgring Lap

Add a Comment

Comments (16)

 Bremen_Koenigsegg Bremen_Koenigsegg
You mean, "...sub 8.0 [minute] barrier...", no?
June 13, 2008 6:18 pm
 BrianWCF BrianWCF
Corrected, thanks!
June 13, 2008 7:34 pm
 Weblissimo Weblissimo
Only a harness and fire extinguisher? It's obviously not the car in the pics then as that has a full roll cage and Sparco race seats????
June 13, 2008 6:28 pm
 dj dj
who cares....still wouldn't buy one
June 13, 2008 7:07 pm
 Kieranieo Kieranieo
I think its a great looking car but i for the price i'd have to look else were
June 13, 2008 7:24 pm
 Spyshot-73 Spyshot-73
This is one of the best handling american cars out there , i think the americans have done really well to get to this stage and still produce impressive lap times . Good Car , I hope it doesnt have a TV like the older caddys.
June 13, 2008 7:26 pm
 radmeister radmeister
Looks nice, interior looks good but for that price i would opt out and get the M3 Sedan.
June 14, 2008 11:53 pm
 MAB MAB
In which part of the video does he talk about the price of the car? I've watched it three times and I must be missing it.
June 15, 2008 12:36 am
 davethepetrolhead davethepetrolhead
Re MAB. radmeister is just a Dickhead that doesn't like GM cars very much. Your right there's no mention of price.He bases his comments on the badge on the bonnet if it was a Nissan he would say how awesome and i can't wait to buy one.
June 15, 2008 2:35 am
 radmeister radmeister
It doesn't take a genius to guess what the MRSP will be, it will be close to the 2007 model which was roughly 52,000$ in the US and closer to 70K in Canada. This is not a cheap car and is competing in a category where it is overshadowed by some better cars, just because the merc C63 and the RS4 are better and I admit that doesn't mean I am biased, it's time to face reality it is in a very competitive category where it gets beaten. If you love GM you would buy this over the C63 or the RS4, if you simply want to get the better car for your $ you would not pick the CTS-V.
June 16, 2008 12:11 pm
 benz_man benz_man
Actually, the CTS-V should come in at about $65,000 USD. I haven't driven the CTS-v, but by specs alone, its superior to the C63 and RS4. However its about the size of a 5 series, and its more capable than the M5. Please explain how this is "beaten" radmeister?
June 16, 2008 3:07 pm
 radmeister radmeister
How is it more capable than the M5? The M5 beat it around the track by 14 seconds, looks better(personal taste). Stops better, only thing the CTS-V is better at is 0-60. Also the CTS falls closer to the M3 sedan than M5, the STS-V is in the same category as the M5.
June 17, 2008 12:46 pm
 benz_man benz_man
Looks lke you got your specs mixed up. The CTS-V beat the M5 around the ring by 14 sec and the M3 by 6sec. And we both know how long 14 sec is in lap times. I didn't say the CTS-V was M5 competition. The CTS is priced and marketed to compete with the 3 series. It is however closer in size and weight to the 5 series (the American way LOL). M5 does 60-0 in 120ft. CTS-V does 60-0 in 109ft. Thats the whole point of 'ring times. To surpass another car by 14sec around the Nordschleife means the leader is dynamically superior in almost every way. And from my experience in the CTS I can personally attest to the quality of interior materials. They are just as good, actually, a little better than BMWs. Not quite at Audi status though. The exterior looks great to me, I love the pronounced grille and flowing angles(isnt that an oxymoron?).
June 17, 2008 3:49 pm
 benz_man benz_man
Incredible product. I'm excited to see GM surpass the Germans at their own game. (CTS-V s**** all over the M5, repeatedly) I just hope they'll continue to play and actually invest money during this cars life-cycle to keep it competitive. We all remember Lincoln and the LS...
June 15, 2008 3:14 pm
 alessandro alessandro
Previous gen V-series was already quit a car. That one is a great piece of work. From real life: previous model (not V-series) was firm to drive but not a squeak in interior, nothing bad at all. Thirsty engine in town to grive ofcourse but not too much. Only thing: what the hell means in Europe that 5 year rust warranty, if european makes have 12-15 year warranties in general.
June 15, 2008 5:33 pm
 jasb jasb
Big engine, bad car. GM continues to move around the deck chairs on the titanic
June 16, 2008 8:43 am