Login
rather, the audi r8 looks like the old mclaren, and this has the essence of the old mclaren of course...
May 9, 2008 12:09 pm
TREMENDUS tremendiously ugly! i dont no y but i c ferrari 360 in it... but still ugly
May 9, 2008 10:30 am
Omg it looks like an Audi R8 ... , If i had the money im sure i wouldnt buy one .
May 9, 2008 10:33 am
you wouldnt buy a mclaren? yikes mate, this'll wipe the floor with anything ferrari, porsche, audi or anyone else can throw at it! the 3 cars built by the mclaren engineers were the F1, SLR and Caparo T1 - quite a good track record, really. besides, this is just a photoshop so it probs wont look anything like this - nobody has any real idea what itl look like...
August 8, 2008 7:18 am
It's a photoshopped image ffs.....Look at the rims, they're taken from the Audi Le Mans Concept. Take a look for urselves.
http://cars.88000.org/wallpapers/15/Audi_Le_Mans_Quattro_Concept,_2003.jpg
May 9, 2008 10:48 am
WCF...before actually posting such an image..should you not do some of your own research first...to check whether it is a true image of a future car or whether it has been photoshopped? It only took me a couple of seconds to realise that it is in fact an R8..
May 9, 2008 10:54 am
The rendering shown above is one a a great number of renderings done by well respected artist Larsson. After reviewing a great deal of renders done before and after cars have been released, you would released how accurate they turn out to be. All renderings done by Larsson are based on fact and are NOT guess work or based of other manufacturers models
May 9, 2008 11:24 am
^ Spot on. This web site is quickly becoming one of the least credible motoring web sites on the net which is a shame because of the speed you get news up.
May 9, 2008 11:00 am
Agreed stillthewhizz, WCF needs to not try and force images up. We all no there are people who don't read the actual articles (can tell by the comments) and just look at the pictures. Don't make them guess and don't put up crappy renderings any more...
The Mclaren is bound to be good, however there are a lot of cars in that league unlike when it enter the F1. The F1 was enter in a catagory with few
May 9, 2008 11:22 am
if there are people who can't be bothered to read the articles, then thats their problem. they deserve to end up misinformed (note: none of this applies to people who do not have english as their first language...if they dont understand the text, then obviously thers not much they can do). As the author of te piece said, if ther are no actual photos of the thing, then a redering will have to do. its better than having a blank spot with the words "no photo available" on it.
May 9, 2008 12:09 pm
I really see an evolution of the old F1...R8 its just a little toy for rookies to talk. Im not saying tah magneride type its bad but for me its not a super car as the GTr its a super car killer jeje
Now a 600hp V10...are they thinking on the BMW P80? that will be the best choice or mabie the GTR engine XD its not bad either cause mercedes engine are bad as they handling jaja
anyway Im really sad because nobody its talking about cars as RUF CTR3 whit 700hp real power cars inseatd some american cra* as ZR1
May 10, 2008 1:39 am
Mercedes engines are bad handling? what about the SLR on some occasions it has posted better laptimes than a 599 GTB. And the ZR1 isnt crap, its the fastest Corvette ever built not to mention most technically sophisticated. You might not like american cars, but calling them crap is just ignorance.
May 10, 2008 12:23 pm
THE BEST PART....... signals the end of the the collaboration between Mercedes and Mclaren..FINALLY
May 10, 2008 11:32 pm
From what i hear the engine in use will be a Mercedes V8, so the partnership will remain intact to a degree.
May 11, 2008 4:24 am
It's interesting to read that most opinion centred around the Audi R8 design, but look closely and you'll see the original F1 Mclaren design has been shrunken.
The twin red surround foglamps are a unique F1 Mclaren design cue.
Mclaren must get back on top of the supercar major league club by pulling power, top-end performance, lightness and a more individual yet recognisable design e.g. roof-mounted air scoop needs to be retained.
October 14, 2008 2:30 pm








