New Mercedes-Benz GLK In Detail

lolx!! lolx! :D hey but it looks better than the X3.. atleast in the blue colour! :O

i second that

+1!!

i'll tell u y we consider it crap!! coz u just dont seem to know wat to compare to wat!! :O a Camaro is a sportscar..er.. well, watever it is.. :P n the GLK is a softroader.. how on Earth r u probably for Christ's sake able to compare the 2?? :O

how could I compare the 2? well it would be unfair competition if I compared it to a real suv.

*unfair towards the merc

u've actually got SUVS.. i mean luxury SUVs.. Escalade.. hmmm.. looks like the trucks.. well, i mean the lorry~truck looks better than those hugely obnoxius thing!! n well, Hummer?? :O lolx.. is that even close to being luxurious?? :? compare the right cars.. if u wanna compare the Camaro, which i do agree, an American car which actually has the a good mix of quality, style, power n some sense of fuel economy.. finally a car so pretty since the Duesenbergs.. :P yea, if u really wanna compare that, then take on the SLR, SL, XK, 6er... well, i'm sure they'd beat that car in terms of quality... but it'll be a close match.. if u wanna compare this car^^ the GLK to an American car, all i have to say is that there is no such niche car to compare to!!:P

hey Joe.. i shouldnt be blaming u.. the American market doesnt have that much of variety.. i mean American manufactured cars.. u have some HUGE cars.. n then some more HUGER cars n then the HUGEST gas guzzling cars.. n which would leave the whole world wondering y on Earth that was ever built! :O n then the next day u'd find some War headlines!! :P OIL OIL everywhere.. not a drop for my car!! :(:(

You do not buy a SUV for fuel economy reasons... So a luxury suv with no power (potential) that doesn't even get decent mileage sucks in all sense of the word. It'd be like someone making a car to compete against the Veyron, that got 15mpg.... But only had 400hp... And weighs just as much. Who cares if it get's better fuel economy? Super cars just aren't eco-friendly, and neither are suv's. Sure I am all for hybrid's in suv's so that they burn less fuel, after all that is cheaper at the pump. But I am against a vehicle whose designers made a suv with 1/3 more fuel economy by cutting the power in half. I will compare it to the GMC Hybrid Yukon, it get's 21city/22highway mpg. Just under the mercedes, but it still has it's 6.0L v8 with 332hp/367lb-ft. Also, imo the Yukon also looks nicer and has more room to haul stuff around in. This is why I compared the merc to a Camaro, it simply can't compete on any basis with North American SUV's.

I'm speechless.. but then thats ur personal taste!! :P

I think theyre trying to apeal to everyone, but as far as im concerned the Mercedes line up should be the c class (just sedan), e class (sedan and wagon w/ a coupe and convertible version replacing the clk), S class (sedan and coupe, renaming the cl, because it is an s class coupe basically) glk class (suv,no m and purposeless r class, gl is to much) g class (suv) sl class (roadster) slk class (roadster) and thats it, just 7 classes.

How much have you been paid to say that?

Eh, I agree i want the Merc too...