New Mercedes 4-Cylinder Diesel Engine
204 hp with 500 Nm of torque
Add a Comment
Login
Comments (35)
Not so bad. Well, they had to if wanting to compete with BMW's *23d. :D
Where's Audi? D:
I recently drove the 170hp 2.0 TDI A4 and got overtaken by a Mini JC Works GP. D:
April 10, 2008 11:33 am
Isn't it normal? The Mini's petrol powered and even more powerful than your A4, and certainly lighter. Nothing but normal!
April 11, 2008 8:42 pm
Pretty good- 204 bhp from a 2.1 diesel, a 2 litre diesel wouldn't have got you anywhere 20 years ago.
Would it fit in an A-class? A hot diesel 3 door A-class would be quite cool.
April 10, 2008 1:29 pm
You reckon the world is ready for a diesel-powered hot hatch?
April 13, 2008 7:36 pm
How can they quote fuel consumption numbers? They will vary drastically according to the car they put it in.
April 10, 2008 1:51 pm
One assumes it's the C-class figures.
Those pics somehow remind me of Frankenstein (the movie). Very nice achievement, but I'd have expected it to be Bluetec from the beginning??
April 10, 2008 10:18 pm
sounds good, especially they've made 3 engines out of 1. WCF you forgot to put the fuel consumption on the table...
April 10, 2008 2:07 pm
On the table, yeah, but since the 2.1l 204 hp engine is said to use 5.4 litres, the others might be around 4.9-?l/100km. Won't get much lower though, I guess.
April 10, 2008 3:01 pm
BMW 318d 143 hp, 300 Nm, 1995cc³, 4 cylinders
BMW 320d 177 hp, 350 Nm, 1995cc³, 4 cylinders
BMW 323d 204 hp, 420 Nm, 1995cc³, 4 cylinders (August 2008)
April 10, 2008 4:31 pm
"TDI technology and Audi/VW are by far on the top when it comes to diesel!"
- yeah right, who is copying who with the Bluetec technology? ;)
April 10, 2008 4:37 pm
SD-AMG - You must be kidding right? Care to share some information of how Audi is copying MB? That would be very entertaining as well. Statement like that would need to be backed up by some facts right? Or its just your humble opinion?
April 10, 2008 4:41 pm
(( Mercedes celebrates the 150th anniversary of Rudolf Diesel's birthday )) That's great .. Germany is great !!
April 10, 2008 6:08 pm
It is pretty stupid to argue who is better, who have more power, Nm, bla, bla, bla... Every of "golden three" (how I call Mercedes, BMW and Audi) have their own place in diesel history, and every of them have its own period of time when it has slightly "better" diesel engine or engines, with a little bit more horse power or torque...
I very welcome every effort of those three giants to bring new, fresh, better diesel engines... Competition is the best thing for us, costumers...
Mercedes is, and it always be, extremely important in diesel engine market. For good connoisseur of automotive industry there is no need to talk about that...
April 10, 2008 8:01 pm
wow the mechanical and electrical on this engine looks like a nightmare to work with!
April 10, 2008 9:39 pm
Very very short torque band.. What's the point of 500nm when you only have it across 200rpm?
April 11, 2008 12:22 pm
oh yea, short torque band. The widest here is 220 CDI. However, 250 CDI has more torque than 220 CDI until 3250rpm.
It's like having 400+ Nm of torque between 1600-3250 rpm.
July 4, 2008 1:08 am
sorry, 250 CDI has 400+ Nm of torque from around 1250-3250 rpm.
now it's wide :)
http://www.worldcarfans.com/9080410.007/mini2/new-mercedes-4-cylinder-diesel-engine
July 4, 2008 1:12 am
Lighter,faster,smaller,better mpg,7-speed auto or paddle shifters,multi clutches,I don't think we need to worry about short torque bands!!!
April 12, 2008 12:31 am
wow. new engine from mercedes (finally). how exciting. and would you look at their names 200, 220, 250...but wait, they have the same CC. damn they're smart.
SD-AMG, i think mercedes are 2-3 engine generations behind VW/AUDI. they didn't built anything new..since...since....well, heck nows. and despite the 201 BHP (careful boys 200 AND ONE bhp) i doubt it's better than a 2.0 TDI 170 bhp. come on now, everybody knows TDI is king in the diesel world.
i just cant imagine how stupid it sounds, saying: "uuu, ive got the new 220/250 cdi...and its a 2 L". when's mb gonna drop this crap
April 12, 2008 7:34 pm
what the hell are you babbling about? mercedes was selling diesels before vw even existed back in the mid thirties, and the current range of 4, 6 and 8 cyl diesel engines are recent and sophisticated, having nothing to envy from the competition, but rather the opposite with their latest innovations such as bluetec (which theyve agreed to share with vw-audi)/bluetec hybrid, not to mention the upcoming revolutionary diesotto cycle.. besides, a simple glance at these specs confirms this new engine is superior to vw's current 2.0 tdi, proving your car-related illiteracy
April 13, 2008 1:46 pm
so what if they were selliing diesels in the 30s? u mean to say even those were better than the current TDIs? :)))).... and the bluetec technology, is one of the lamest. personaly, i dont like any hybrid.
April 13, 2008 6:30 pm
Bluetec is not a hybrid system. Please, stop commenting on this article -- you clearly have zero authority on the matter.
April 13, 2008 7:32 pm
You need to consider everyday driving conditions. The engine produces 400+ N-m (within 20% of upper limit) from ~1300 to ~3300 RPM, which is pretty nifty.
April 13, 2008 7:47 pm
LETS SEE LIGHTER,MORE HORSEPOWER,MORE TORQUE,LESS CU. IN.,COOLER ENGINE TEMP.,NO TURBO LAG, SEEMS NONSENCE TO TALK ABOUT SMALL TORQUE BAND WIDTH.what do you want an F-50?
April 14, 2008 3:03 am
#1: Stop typing in all caps. #2: Yes, I would like an F50. #3: There is turbo lag. With very few exceptions, turbocharged cars suffer turbo lag; some more than others, but still noticeable. #4: I was saying the torque band is adequate for its application. #5 Your pseudonym is irritating.
April 14, 2008 5:40 am
More so now than in the past Mercedes, BMW and Audi share many of the same Tier 1 suppliers with the EXACT same hardware. The differences in the product being in the software. To state that one is "the king" or "generations ahead" is ludicrous now. I'm astonished to see manufacturers pulling such high HP and TQ numbers from such small engine sizes. Engine efficiency is WAY up and the consumer gets the prize. Good power, good fuel mileage, clean emissions! Radmeister, you're spot-on. The Tq curve is a little peaky for an oil-burner, but thats only to be expected of such a small engine. However, most (more than 50%) of it is available just off idle. Which, combined with a small, high pressure engine that revs quickly (for a diesel) and the correct gearing (how can you mess up with 7 ratios?) has the potential be just about perfect. lol
April 14, 2008 6:18 am
How cool!! This engine as exactly the same power figures as the 123d: 204HP. Isn't that suspicious?
April 15, 2008 8:31 pm








