Audi RS 8 Gets Turbo V10 with 572 bhp
No more denying it! On sale in 2009.
Add a Comment
Login
Comments (38)
Wow, now we are talking, it was already an amazing car now it is just orgasmic.
April 1, 2008 4:21 pm
will the weight of the car increase???
should have made a twin turbo V8... lighter in weight and they could have had more balance??
i think the V8 is the best balanced engine... dunno though thats what i've heard correct me if i'm wrong
nontheless... kick a$$ car :)
April 1, 2008 4:31 pm
i cant be certain but i think that might have something to do w. fuel efficiency thats why they prob didnt put a twin turbos on a v8
April 1, 2008 8:27 pm
60 degree V-12s are naturaly balanced, through second-order vibrations.
April 1, 2008 10:28 pm
actually radmeister if you read it you would see that it says that its gonna be a V10 almost everywhereon the page
April 1, 2008 7:11 pm
I believe it's a joke. and not bad one. But this one: "some may even start accusing Germany of another world war", Mr. Thami Masemola, is a bad taste joke.
April 1, 2008 7:17 pm
I agree, it is not funny, because it doesn't make sense. They'd be accused of starting a civil war since it is between German rivals. ^-^
April 1, 2008 8:08 pm
lol yeah i was thinking that! and "..Audi would take the bull by its sharpest thorns..." hahahah err.. he meant horns right!?
April 3, 2008 9:42 am
Here is the link to the Autocar.co.uk article: http://www.autocar.co.uk/News/NewsArticle/Audi-R8/231987/
April 1, 2008 9:37 pm
I wouldn't say this is an April fools joke...
This one is the joke:
http://www.worldcarfans.com/9080401.003/kia-kee_wii-concept-revealed
April 1, 2008 10:26 pm
A huge engine and just 4s ??? what a waste of engineering, learn from nissan a little :S. That V10 is not diesel, the V12 is...still too much engine for low power and torque
April 1, 2008 11:09 pm
I know someone who has preorderd two of these, hes minted, but still will make a nice bit by selling em
April 2, 2008 1:30 am
Why would one Turbo charge an already big engine and only just manage to beat a heavier and natural aspirated smaller engined RS4 by a mere 1 second? Sub 3 seconds should be the target as someone has already mentioned the Nissan GTR achieves 3.8 seconds 0 - 100 witha turbo V6. This must have been an April fools joke.
April 2, 2008 4:06 am
The thing I still haven't been able to grasp is why they put the same engine in the 4 door RS 4. And then made this car not even 200 lbs lighter then the RS 4. And they somehow are asking twice the price? Normally I hate 4 door cars, but ignoring the price and going purely on looks and performance, I would have a very hard time choosing between either of these cars. I mean the R8 has a slight edge when it comes to performance... but the rs4 looks so much nicer. Oh well, I guess that's why they are releasing newer more expensive versions of this car with bigger engines. Come to think of it, the tt rs would fit in exactly for the kind of car I am going to be looking for once I graduate. Performance, looks, 2 doors, and hella cheaper then the r8 and all of its performance versions.
April 2, 2008 4:08 am
Forget your 0-62 figures guys, there meaningless in the terms of cars like this. Its more like your 70-150mph which this car would excel at over the RS4.
April 2, 2008 7:49 am
Don't forget the turbos increase efficiency exponentially (CAFE). And, the V10's in the middle of the Rs8 instead of hanging over the front axle centerline like in the RS4. Think of how neutral and blissful handling will be...
April 2, 2008 4:41 pm
The R8 is only a "base" model. And besides, Audis were never famous for ultra performance super cars, this is just the start.
April 2, 2008 4:37 am








