Topless pictures are always exciting, but videos tend to be more popular. If you think we are talking about women (we could also be doing it, but not here and not now), think again. This sentence suits perfectly well the new Alfa Romeo 8C Spider. We have already shown you all technical specs, gorgeous pictures and even the presentation video at the Geneva Motor Show, but those who have watched this presentation may have noticed that, on the background, a nice footage video, with the coupe and the spider, was being shown. Alfa Romeo took a while to release it, but here it is.
Besides the nice images, which show a road meeting of the two versions of the 8C in a wonderful scenery, there’s something else that might be of interest, both to ownership candidates and to World Car Fans in general: price tips. Magazines that have already had the chance to drive the car speculate the Spider will cost something above US$ 200,000, or between £ 120,000 and £ 130,000.
This high price tag is due to exclusivity and, of course, to what the car can do. First of all, only 500 Spider units will be built. Last, but not least, its body is made of carbon fibre and powered by a 450 bhp (at 7,000 rpm) V8 4.7-litre engine, the same one used for the coupe. Since these are the vehicles Alfa Romeo has chosen to get back to the most important car market in the world, the USA, they could present nothing below these standards.
Source: Alfa RomeoAlfa Romeo Releases Video of 8C Spider in Motion
Expect Prices Around £ 125 K
By Gustavo Henrique Ruffo
March 16, 2008 7:02 PM
Filed Under: Alfa Romeo, American
Comments
Joe_Limon
March 16, 2008 7:18 PM
such a nice car, tis a shame the rear bumper still looks like a face with the eyes spaced to far apart.
carcrazy1234
March 17, 2008 1:47 AM
you talk like your 12 bud and u clearly have no class... especially when u say the rear bumper looks like a face with eyes faced far apart no offense but that's how u sound
Joe_Limon
March 17, 2008 2:02 AM
That is the only way I know how to describe it. I just really don't like those two lights and how far apart they are spaced. The rest of the car is amazing, and if it were priced in at $40,000-$50,000 it would be easy to overlook the tail lights. But no, over $200,000+ for that? Also if you are going to criticize me for sounding like I am 12, try not to spell you as u 3 times in the same message.
ck314
March 17, 2008 3:19 AM
how in the hell do you expect a limited series of a work of art made of carbon fiber and bearing a ferrari engine to cost $40K? seriously you better go back watch the cartoon network!
carcrazy1234
March 17, 2008 3:21 AM
the funny thing is i can actually talk like that and use "u" a million times in a sentance because i'm only 17 bud lol not 20 and a little more matured?? seriously now... even gugas below agrees with me... u compared an alfa to a FACE with EYES SPREAD apart and u even had the nerve to compare it to an RX-8... like WHERE do u get this rx-8 from??? and also thankyou to m555david for pointing that out too about the GT Alfa 6c 3000!!
carcrazy1234
March 17, 2008 3:22 AM
w/e though joe_limon... you say w/e you have to say and i'll just ignore it next time :) thankss
Joe_Limon
March 17, 2008 3:51 AM
I live in Canada, I never really liked any alpha romeo designs up till now so I never did bother to look into specs, or anything. My opinion is comparable to someone in North America taking a glance at the car driving past. The design of the car is nice, but nothing about it's design would suggest it has a Ferrari engine, or that its a carbon fiber beast. That is how I could compare it to a rx8, or say that I expected it to cost around $40,000. Seriously, if a Allard J2X MKII drove past you, would you know it's name or that it has either anything from a 6 liter hemi to a Cadillac Northstar engine in it? No you probably wouldn't on the basis that you have about as much insight into that car, as I do this one.
carcrazy1234
March 17, 2008 5:46 AM
funny... i live in canada too lol 1. why would it WANT to suggest that it has a ferrari engine? or even the design came from ferrari? i rather have it be unique than a follower of another car company (even if it IS from ferrari itself) 2. i still think ur on crack for comparing an alfa with a mazda... 3. we all know the ownerships of cars and the companys... we dont need extra designs to tell us that another car company OWNS the car i'm driving lol 4. L shaped rear lights would NOT look good :P (juts saw ur renderings) damn just go buy an RX-8 dude :P
Joe_Limon
March 17, 2008 6:18 AM
1. For a design to suggest it has a really potent engine behind it, it doesn't have to look like a Ferrari. 2. Common compare that rendering to the original pic. http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v39/joe_limon/morecars/02.jpg?t=1205726707 the round tail lights just don't suit the car. Something more aggressive is needed. My picture may have only taken 10 minutes to draw, but I feel it gets the point across that the stock rear tail lights could look better. Back to the price, at $250,000 you are buying a car that would cost $150,000 to make, and the left over $100,000 is paying for the logo. Ditch the brand name recognition, and swap in an equivalently spec'd engine and you got yourself the exact same car for $100,000. As a bonus, the car would be more reliable and cheaper to fix.
Joe_Limon
March 16, 2008 9:30 PM
oh shit, for that price? hahahahahahahahahaha oh hahahahahahahaaha... here I thought it was just an expensive mazda rx8
gugas
March 17, 2008 1:45 AM
looks like a face with the eyes spaced to far apart??? Mazda RX8?? Yeah!! You're 20 years old!
m555david
March 17, 2008 2:31 AM
it is forgiving for everyone who is not familiar with alfa history specifically with them paying respect to their heritage and the most stunning cars that were ever created. This car is a simply put a remake of a successful formula for a super fast GT Alfa 6C 3000, which was extremely popular and rare indeed
ck314
March 17, 2008 3:14 AM
yep, and those rounded tail lights are typical italian heritage as well.. Joe_Limon would have probably expected two irregular red bricks full of leds à la nissan
Joe_Limon
March 17, 2008 3:41 AM
a sideways L shape would have looked nicer, especially if the tailight edges flowed with the rest of the back end... here I drew a pic to show you what I think would have looked nicer. http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v39/joe_limon/morecars/alpharear.jpg?t=1205718096
m555david
March 17, 2008 6:25 AM
those are the scetches of what exactly maserati did with their coupe 4 years before they started bringing them to US http://memimage.cardomain.net/member_images/12/web/2928000-2928999/2928882_1.jpg
and as you have probably noticed the retro theme throughout the design of Alfa, i don't think your overly futuristic rendering can play along with paying respect to the PAST, not the future. not yet at least
ck314
March 17, 2008 11:41 PM
agreed, hadnt it been a limited series those tail lights would have been adequate i guess, say the substitute of the brera or w/e
kattanh3
March 17, 2008 8:11 AM
beautiful cars but I'm liking the coupe more. The rear reminds me of the shelby cobra 1 series.
[]V[]orbid[]V[]an
March 19, 2008 10:21 AM
I don't agree on our 20 year old joe limon here about how the rear is a bit far apart....but i will say that the rear really doesn't do the front any justice...the front of this car is just so expressive and does it with such ease. Not that the rear isn't pretty, i was really hoping for something a little more imaginative...front says "i'm sexy", but back says,"i'm a dork..." however....i have met sexy dorks in my time...
Add Comment
[cancel]
