Mercedes B-Class Facelift In Detail

 Mercedes B-Class Facelift In Detail
Mercedes B-Class Facelift

Better shape than ever

Press Release

Diesel engines: fuel consumption reduced by a further seven percent

The B-Class continues to be available with a choice of six engines – two direct-injection diesel units (80 kW/109 hp and 103 kW/140 hp) delivering up to 300 Newton metres of torque, as well as four petrol engines with a peak power output of up to 142 kW/193 hp and a maximum torque of 280 Newton metres. The four-cylinder power units have undergone a series of detailed improvements in order to further reduce fuel consumption.

For the diesel models, this means that the combined NEDC fuel consumption
of the B 180 CDI and B 200 CDI has dropped by as much as seven percent – depending on tyre size – to 5.2 - 5.4 and 5.4 - 5.6 litres per 100 kilometres, respectively. The two turbodiesel models will therefore be an even less seldom sight at the filling station from now on; the B 180 CDI can clock up over 1000 kilometres on a single tank of fuel (54 litres).

Petrol models: new fuel-saving ECO start/stop function

Depending on the model and engine output, the four petrol variants of the B Class return fuel consumption figures of between 6.6 and 8.1 litres per 100 kilometres on the NEDC driving cycle. From autumn 2008, motoring is set to become even more economical with the arrival of the B 150 and B 170 BlueEFFICIENCY models featuring the ECO start/stop function (optional). This newly developed function automatically switches the engine off when the driver shifts to neutral at low speed whilst depressing the brake pedal. If the criteria for stopping the engine are fulfilled, a special display appears in the instrument cluster to inform the driver.

The moment the clutch is pressed or the brake pedal released, the engine springs back to life almost noiselessly and in a fraction of a second. This ability to restart the engine swiftly yet smoothly gives the ECO start/stop function a key edge over other systems of this type. To achieve this, Mercedes-Benz fits a starter-generator which is connected to the crankshaft via the belt drive. This allows the engine to start much faster and far more quietly than with the conventional starter. During the journey, the starter-generator feeds the electrical system on board the B-Class with energy.

In practical operation, substantial fuel savings of up to nine percent can be achieved with the ECO start/stop function, particularly when driving in city traffic with frequent stops at traffic lights or in tailbacks.

Natural-gas drive: a clean and economical alternative

A further new addition to the B-Class range bears the initials "NGT" on the right-hand side of its tailgate. They stand for "Natural Gas Technology" and identify a model variant which is as economical as it is environmentally compatible, courtesy of its bi-fuel drive: the B 170 NGT BlueEFFICIENCY is able to run on both natural gas and premium grade petrol while delivering an identical maximum output of 85 kW/116 hp.

In addition to the petrol tank, there are five natural gas reservoirs whose total capacity of 16 kilograms equates to a range of over 300 kilometres. With overall NEDC consumption figures of 7.3 litres of premium petrol and 4.9 kilograms of natural gas per 100 kilometres, the new B 170 NGT BlueEFFICIENCY is therefore able to attain a total range in excess of 1000 kilometres. The driver determines which power source the engine is run on at the touch of a button using the multifunction steering wheel; an electronic control unit carries out the switch instantaneously without any jolts – even while on the move.

The four-cylinder engine has been modified by Mercedes-Benz to include additional gas injectors on the underside of the intake manifold. A close-coupled pressure governor with electromagnetic shut-off valve regulates the supply of natural gas and keeps the pressure within the system constant.

The installation of the gas reservoirs, which are located in the rear and underneath the front passenger footwell, reduces the boot capacity of the B Class by 128 to 422 litres (as per the VDA measurement method), but there is still sufficient space for carrying a family's luggage.

The lower carbon dioxide emissions and cheaper fuel costs make natural gas an attractive alternative to petrol and diesel, both ecologically and economically speaking. On the NEDC cycle, the CO2 emissions are 17 percent lower than in the petrol-powered B 170 at 135 grams per kilometre. If the 4.9 kilograms (7.5 m³) of natural gas consumed per 100 kilometres by the new B 170 NGT BlueEFFICIENCY is converted into the equivalent quantity of petrol energy, the fuel cost per kilometre is around 50 percent less than when running on petrol.

Key B-Class engine, performance and fuel consumption figures at a glance:

  B 180 CDI B 200 CDI B 150 B 170 B 170 NGT B 200 B 200 TURBO
Displacement cm³ 1991 1991 1498 1699 2034 2034 2034
Output kW/hp 80/109 103/140 70/95 85/116 85/116 100/136 142/193
Max. torque Nm 250 at 1600- 2600 rpm 300 at 1600- 3000 rpm 140 at 3500- 4000 rpm 155 at 3500- 4000 rpm 165 at 3500- 4000 rpm 185 at 3500- 4000 rpm 280 at 1800- 4850 rpm
0-100 km/h s 11.3 9.6 13.2 11.3 12.4 10.1 7.6
Top speed km/h 183 200 174 184 184 196 225
NEDC consumption l/100 km* 5.2-5.4 5.4-5.6 6.6-6.8 6.8-7.1 7.5 m³ 7.2-7.5 7.9-8.1
CO2 emissions g/km** 137-140 140-148 158-163 163-171 135 173-180 190-195

*combined consumption; **in NEDC driving cycle

Environmental Certificate: first ever lifecycle assessment for NGT drive too

Mercedes engineers have, for the first time, compiled an eco balance sheet for the natural-gas drive. It forms one element of the Environmental Certificate awarded to the B-Class by Germany's TÜV Technical Inspection Authority. Mercedes-Benz is the only automotive brand in the world to have been granted this certificate, which is based on the stringent international standard ISO 14062 "Design For Environment". It is a confirmation of the Stuttgart-based brand's total commitment to all aspects of environmental protection. In contrast to just the standardised measurement of exhaust emissions and fuel consumption on the roller dynamometer, Mercedes engineers analyse the environmental compatibility of vehicles over their entire lifecycle – starting with their manufacture, continuing with their many years of use and finishing with their end-of-life disposal.

In all, over 40,000 individual processes come under scrutiny, whose analysis, computation and evaluation ultimately produce a comprehensive eco profile. This in turn forms the basis for the environmental certificate of the B-Class.

The results of this integrated analysis over a total distance travelled of 150,000 kilometres highlight, for example, a number of clear advantages for the natural-gas drive. The overall CO2 emissions are some 20 percent below the figure for the comparable petrol-engined model. Nitrogen oxide emissions are eleven percent lower, while the experts have calculated a 54 percent difference in carbon monoxide emissions over the entire lifecycle in favour of the natural-gas drive. The greater ecological cost of the manufacturing process for the new B 170 NGT is therefore balanced out after a distance of 17,300 kilometres.

The environmentally driven concept of the B-Class is clearly evident from its use of high-quality recycled plastics, for instance, or its components made from natural materials, including flax, cotton, coconut fibre, wood veneer and fibres from the abaca banana.

Source: Daimler AG

Add a Comment

Comments (23)

Subscribe to comments
 122 122
Spot the difference? Realistically i only see the front bumper changed.
March 14, 2008 10:22 am
 FastLane FastLane
Both the B-Class & the A-Class should be taken off production of this very ugly car, do people actually buy this car? or do they buy them because they cost low and have the mercedes logo, so to say they drive a mercedes! Production of these two cars should be stopped.. UGLY!
March 14, 2008 11:16 am
 wjaprep wjaprep
Ok, I agree, Mercedes shouldnt make these models anymore.
March 14, 2008 5:49 pm
 joelynn joelynn
Still haven't sorted out the awkward/dull back end
March 14, 2008 12:06 pm
 designerr designerr
Dull end,,nice front face.not very difference.but i love this ugly mercedes.............
March 14, 2008 12:25 pm
 ck314 ck314
wtf? everyone bashing the back end, which is the most "personal" part of this car.. i like it better than the a-class anyway
March 14, 2008 12:38 pm
 radmeister radmeister
Cool little car, i like the idea of the alternator and starter motor being 1. Surprised it took so long for someone to do that.
March 14, 2008 2:02 pm
 coopergt coopergt
better looking than the ugly bmw 1 series hatch
March 14, 2008 3:22 pm
 122 122
Well thats not saying much is it?
March 14, 2008 7:26 pm
 ck314 ck314
lets also say bmw's 1-series handling is years light ahead from this crossover (minivan-compact wagon)
March 14, 2008 7:52 pm
 ck314 ck314
light years my bad lol
March 14, 2008 7:53 pm
 FastLane FastLane
Let me repeat again, A-Class, B-Class & CLC-Class should all be stopped! UGLY! Mercedes-Benz do something about those cars, and dont ruin the Mercedes-Benz image!
March 14, 2008 10:02 pm
 Zaiyan Zaiyan
CLC`s face is OK,but its tail light is boring.
March 15, 2008 2:30 am
 Zaiyan Zaiyan
I think CLC`s face is impressive but its taillight is unwelcomed
March 15, 2008 2:59 am
 BabyMilo BabyMilo
ive always thought that this is the uglies mercedes but wen i herd that there was a facelift i got my hopes up but no they were crushed! and the bmw 1 series hatch is a WAY better looking car than this thing
March 15, 2008 3:40 am
 unknown unknown
close to 325k sold. That is impressive since most of them are sold in Europe.
March 15, 2008 11:00 am
 abramo abramo
I share the opinion that the B class is probably the ugliest MB car *ever*. The design of the back is horrible. This facelift is minor and a complete let down. In contrast, I find the A class cute, practical and an unpretentious quality town family car. This is the reason it has sold in the millions to date. As a current owner I highly recommend it - and I would never "upgrade" to the current B class.
March 15, 2008 3:39 pm
 joelynn joelynn
What about the Vaneo- surely that was uglier than the B-class?
March 16, 2008 7:21 am
 abramo abramo
Vaneo, competing very effectively in ugliness to B class, as you correctly point out, has however an excuse, being kind of a utility vehicle that has evolved from an actual van design. As such it may even be considered a success in compromise. What excuse is there, however, for B class ugliness? None. B class has a definite position in the marketplace, as it offers a much improved boot volume in comparison to A class - very desirable for travelling families. But its present aesthetic condition puts off many prospective buyers, including A class owners needing more boot space.
March 16, 2008 7:59 am
 ck314 ck314
Many people tend to mistake dull for ugly. I don't see how this car could be ugly, since it's just boxy and functional inspiring confidence. In tune with european (mostly germanic) soccer moms needs, and confirmed by its commercial success. I personally don't find a Golf Plus or a Toyota Corolla Verso sexier than this.
March 16, 2008 12:36 pm
 abramo abramo
certainly, "beauty is in the eye of the beholder". as for the "commercial success" part, I have my reservations - the Renault Scenic, a car equivalent to the B class selling at the same price range, sells over 350,000 units *per year*, dwarfing the 325,000 units in *three years* of the B class even without the benefit of the Mercedes brand.
March 17, 2008 11:38 am
 ck314 ck314
Sure, but despite similarities, they have different aims. The Scenic is a bestseller because 1. it's mostly used as a fist car for young/low budget families while the B-class is more a second/spouse car for average to high income families 2. Renault has a quite wider offer (two wheelbases available plus trendy suv-like versions, etc) 3. more agressive discount/leasing approach and so on. Besides, it would be unfair to compare premium vs popular brands. It's like comparing Clio vs A-Class sales.
March 17, 2008 8:38 pm
 designerr designerr
abramo, my friend has a A-CLASS.i am agree with u.the design of the back in B-class really horrible.
March 15, 2008 4:13 pm