$2 Million Supercar Chooses Suppliers

DiMora Natalia SLS 2 now near production

DiMora Natalia SLS 2 / DiMora
DiMora Natalia SLS 2
DiMora Natalia SLS 2
DiMora Natalia SLS 2
DiMora Natalia SLS 2
DiMora Natalia SLS 2

Add a Comment

Comments (22)

newest first oldest first

Aesthetics

nuevo riches extreme

December 26, 2007 12:18 pm

report abuse | reply

Badass_Benny

This is what happens when a Maybach copulates with an Excalibur

December 26, 2007 1:59 pm

report abuse | reply

heinz

does'nt look like a supercar.

December 26, 2007 3:46 pm

report abuse | reply

FOXHOUND

wow this is like a new level of uglyness in my opinion, i think bentley, mercedes, and rolls royce look infinitly better.

December 26, 2007 4:35 pm

report abuse | reply

thamzn

Quite an interesting study in car production. What kinda customer will buy it though? I also don't understand why it's so powerful when you clearly can't chuck it around corners like a Lambo, Porsche or Ferrari.

December 26, 2007 5:45 pm

report abuse | reply

NitrousOxide

The specifications of the car are amazing, but none is suiting the other. Moreover, it looks like they designed the car in dark, and decided to go on with it any way.. I doubt they will sell 2 cars a year.. With all its technology,it will be a good example of worst investments..

December 26, 2007 8:46 pm

report abuse | reply

Marsman

Look Like A shrinked Volvo Tractor Trailer

December 26, 2007 8:48 pm

report abuse | reply

DB9

yea, $2million dollar car, i'm definetly gonna be driving this in the ice and snow. WASTE.

December 26, 2007 9:10 pm

report abuse | reply

TomJonesCirca1969

Man!!!!! This car is unbelievably Ugly-Looking. This one's for the queen of Saudi Arabia!!

December 27, 2007 2:27 am

report abuse | reply

teo

Welcome back "Horsch"

December 27, 2007 5:31 am

report abuse | reply

bmwaddict

The back looks nice but the front in kinda american. I wonder what Clarkson has to say about this car.

December 27, 2007 8:36 pm

report abuse | reply

MB6.3

What a stupid reason to build a car. Whats the point of making the most expensive car in the world. The price should follow the car itself. Of course to make profits, companies should set a certain strategic price range to compete with other makers, but the idea of building a car just for the sake of making it the most expensive car is pure bullcrap. Even the Veyron has a purpose, it is (or used to be) the fastest production car while at the same time retaining the throne of being the most expensive. Aesthetically, this car is hideous, and i would get a Phantom (which is one quarter of the price but many times better looking) over this any day.

December 28, 2007 4:10 am

report abuse | reply

dorry

i couldn't agree more with u MB6.3 but lets wait and see it might be worth it (it looks like shit)

December 28, 2007 7:39 pm

report abuse | reply

buozgs01

I pay 2Million$ and get this ugly machine?

December 29, 2007 10:51 pm

report abuse | reply

radmeister

Hmmm interesting when i read about the HeatFlexx i was expecting something cool like it zapps your windshield dry, but after looking it up all it is is a frameless wiper like the ones you can find at any automotive store for 20$ with a metal wire going through the rubber blade heating it.. WoW.......... 2 million dollars and thats the best they could come up with? Why not put a transparent conductor within the windsield itself, kind of like a defroster on your rear windshield? That would have been better. With the wire being on the wiper you have to worry about shorts from cyclical loading on the wire everytime you flip the wipers on there is a chance to fry your 2million dollar car.

December 30, 2007 8:58 am

report abuse | reply

1 reply

ck314

Ford has been doing it for awhile, and it's really practical in winter, but under certain sunlight situations the inbuilt conductor could be slightly seen and it becomes... slightly irritating, eventhough it doesn't affect visibility per se. About the ugly facia, well, I want to believe it's just a provocation, and that they will come up with something more decent all the while keeping that eccentric american charm that made Stutz or Avanti desirable in the past. On this pic it features a mesh grille, looks better in my opinion: http://www.dimoramotorcar.com/_uploaded_files/NatBody1170.jpg

January 1, 2008 1:45 pm

report abuse | reply

heinz

it looks like it only goes 150kph(at the very most).

December 31, 2007 10:51 am

report abuse | reply

heinz

isn''t it a hot rod or something really really old?

December 31, 2007 10:54 am

report abuse | reply

audi4ever

Has quite a nice design overall, except for that hideous front end and excessive lighting at the rear. Oh well, we'll have to see :/

January 1, 2008 11:47 am

report abuse | reply

vorsprung

Has quite a nice design overall, except for that hideous front end and excessive lighting at the rear. Oh well, we'll have to see :/

January 1, 2008 12:04 pm

report abuse | reply

ck314

Engine type: 14.0 Liter V16 Displacement: 14018 cc (855.3 cubic inches) V-angle: 100 degrees Compression ratio: 11.0:1 Valve configuration: Overhead valves, 2 per cylilnder Valve lifters: Hydraulic roller Firing order: 1-12-8-11-7-14-5-16-4-15-3-10-6-9-2-13 Bore x stroke 104.78 x 101.6 mm Fuel system: Sequential fuel injection ************ 100 degrees? wow, and why not four valves per cylinder and direct injection? I hope it's going to meet California's restrictive emission regulations...

January 1, 2008 2:03 pm

report abuse | reply

view more comments