Ferrari Considering V8 for Next Enzo?

Ferrari Enzo
Ferrari Enzo

Add a Comment

Comments (33)

 moyusuf moyusuf
That doesnt sound like something Ferrari would do... I hope they dont stick by this weird option for heritage's sake.
November 29, 2007 12:29 pm
 JohnnyG JohnnyG
I like Ferrari's concept of an optimum power-to-weight ratio, but this is the Enzo we are talking about...
November 29, 2007 12:29 pm
 joelynn joelynn
Ferrari has Maserati to donate whichever engine they don't use to, so they might aswell develop both
November 29, 2007 12:48 pm
 JohnnyG JohnnyG
I believe Ferrari and Maserati parted...I think, about 90% sure.
November 29, 2007 2:52 pm
 carfan519 carfan519
ferrari giving in to benz/bmw/audi power wars? Giving up?
November 29, 2007 1:17 pm
 BENZian BENZian
Ferrari is being realistic. The 6.3 AMG V8 makes as much or more power & torque than competitors V12s. V12s are a symbol of Status but they are not necessary anymore to insure maximum power...and in a way this is an area where supercars/high-horsepower sports cars can be a little more green and maintain performance, decrease weight, and increase mpg. (reference BMW's twin turbo 3.0 V6 & any number of turbo Porsches) I am waiting for Benz/AMG to add twin turbos to the 6.3 AMG V8 and really drop the hammer down...
November 29, 2007 4:46 pm
 zimstyles zimstyles
This is a tragedy if they follow through
November 29, 2007 1:38 pm
 _M7_ _M7_
the best ferrari car have a V8 twin turbo....F40. Now they can achive 900hp whit this engine I really hope to see a decent Ferrari once more...as F40
November 29, 2007 1:39 pm
 carfan519 carfan519
ferrari cant really compete in the power wars anymore. Even the RS6 has the same amount of torque as an enzo. CL65 has wayyyy more torque! The power wars are basically won
November 29, 2007 2:25 pm
 pc pc
silversedanman, give it up. In the sportscarworld, it's all about overall package not all power. It's kinda easy to shove any hugh engine in a car but to actually make it handles is another story. Does the CL65 outperform the CLK black on track? I don't think so. I'm helping you out here. I'm even comparing a benz to a benz. Get your head out of your A hole and look around. Germany makes great cars but manufactures from other countries make great cars too. Your prejudice has no place on this forum dude. No matter how many time you get kicked out and signed back in under different names, we'll know.
November 29, 2007 4:06 pm
 pc pc
To add to that...all 911s have 6 cylinders and make less power, and significantly less tourque than the CL65, the M5 "only" have 500hp from a V10 engine. All GT-Rs (with the exception of the new one) have inline-6, with less power. An SLR also has less tourque than the CL65. All these cars would outperform the nose-heavy CL65 on the ring. What's the point of comparing a touring car (like a cl) to sportscars.
November 29, 2007 5:00 pm
 radmeister radmeister
Pc you are the 1 that compared a sportscar to the CL, everybody knows that the CL is the ultimate grand touring car with the exception of the bentley azure brooklands. And this v8 deal doesnt make sense to me, just by taking away cylinders you dont save weight. You can have a 6L v8 and a 6L V12 weigh the same, its the size of the engine that matters. Ferrari's top of the line car has always had a V12 this would be a disgrace especially seeing how the car is named in the honour of Enzo. They should either make a smaller V12 or use their F1 technology in materials to build a lighter block.
November 29, 2007 6:30 pm
 pc pc
I wasn't the one comparing the CL. It was a response to the comment above. This topic is a bout Ferrari NOT power war. This dude brought it up and I was respoding to it. You should read the comments carefully before making a comment on a comment.
November 29, 2007 10:05 pm
 radmeister radmeister
And all this talk of power wars applies to american rednecks because the only way they can sell a car is through these muscle wars. Ferrari doesn't care bout hp wars because at the end of the day they are a company based on racing and its more than brute force that gets you around the track faster than the competition, for example an F1 car vs. a Bugatti the Bugatti has a lot more hp and 3x the torque but the F1 car would run laps around it.
November 29, 2007 6:34 pm
 pc pc
I disagree. The power war also applies to German manufactures as well. Look at the new RS cars and newer AMG cars. If you read my comment carefully, I clearly stated that it's all about a complete package NOT always power.
November 29, 2007 10:07 pm
 BENZian BENZian
I strongly disagree with the "american redneck" comment...you should be able to discuss the subject without intolerant bigotry and negative stereotypes...
November 30, 2007 3:02 am
 carfan519 carfan519
porsche and even BMW ofcourse has faster nordschleife then ferrari. Let the power wars continue.
November 29, 2007 8:52 pm
 radmeister radmeister
Of course, and ferrari has faster Maranello times. They each excell in their testing environments.
November 30, 2007 1:04 am
 pc pc
It's like saying all Ferraris have faster Marenello lap times. Who won F1 this year? Ferrari right? and last year? Renault. How's BMW doing in F1? Who one 24hrs at le mans? Audi right? You're comparing a CL65 and BMWs to Ferraris? Come on!
November 29, 2007 10:09 pm
 mojammer mojammer
I think this is good. Ferrari is looking more towards usable ability; like when they first came out with the Enzo they said they weren't gunning for fastest car in the world, and people said "what? that's lame, it's the fastest title that counts, without it your car is worthless." Now they're looking for other ways to make a fantastic 200mph car that is easy to drive and also bat-out-of-hell fast around a track.
November 29, 2007 11:34 pm
 radmeister radmeister
I dont think anybody buys a ferrari with how easy it is to drive on the mind, those ppl buy a Rolls Royce if they have the cash if not they get a Toyota Corolla.
November 30, 2007 1:03 am
 mojammer mojammer
I meant that ferraris aren't as hard and rough as say a viper. I don't mean like a rolls or mb or something like that. And no I'm not speaking from experience, just from what magazines say about them.
November 30, 2007 7:58 pm
 carfan519 carfan519
The slr is a better easy to drive car
November 30, 2007 12:32 am
 radmeister radmeister
The RS series from audi was long overdue, and AMG has always been making crazy powerful cars even when they had no other german competition. Germans are more conservative, the carrera gt could have been veyron fast, their AMGs could have kept the 7.3L v12 and be making close to 800hp by now but they didnt. If there was a war we would see crazy figures coming out of germany. I think each company is offering what is in demand. Because at the end of the day if you are in the market for a BMW Audi or Merc you have enough education behind u to look at more than just hp.
November 30, 2007 1:14 am
 dvvvb dvvvb
V8?? You mean the best ferrari? Forget it. may be there would have a concept car...
November 30, 2007 11:47 am
 NaBUru38 NaBUru38
I would love a twin turbo. I agree with benzian, this is the only way to improve performance and fuel economy at the same time. And don't double the power, halve the weight.
November 30, 2007 1:46 pm
 rydamee rydamee
sounds like most of you guys are teenagers. nothing on the planet could touch the f40 when it was out. no other ferrari sounded as sweet or hit you as hard when the turbos spooled up. maybe the italians realized that 4 extra cylinders didn't add power as easily as 2 turbos. since the vw group brought variable turbine technology to the table, manufacturers are seeing the bonuses. normally aspirated engines are all limited by the air they recieve. turbos are looped so that more exhaust=more intake air which = more exhaust and on and on. radmeister, how do you compare a full blown race car to a street coupe? its like all carbon fiber and its downforce is probably equal to the veyrons weight. not to mention its electronics are light years ahead of the bugatti. its designed to go balls out whenever its on the TRACK. the veyron is not a track car. talk about the caparro t1 vs the f1 car if you want to compare track cars. some of you guys show real, unbiased car knowledge. others say things that instantly prove you are not a car person or you're under 16 and trying to figure it out still.
November 30, 2007 3:13 pm
 radmeister radmeister
I was comparing it to show that its not only power that counts because a veyron has much more power than an F1 car.
November 30, 2007 8:45 pm
 Joe_Limon Joe_Limon
man this flaming is more interesting the the topic itself
November 30, 2007 4:39 pm
view more comments