Audi RS 6 Avant Revealed

when I see Mercedes cars, I feel nothing could be better of it. But when I see these Audi's sport cars I feel it's really better than Mercedes cars !!!

I think Audi is just throwing everywhere with horses.It's still a twin turbo!! Look at the M5/6 , it's still a V10 but it is a normally aspirated engine, still delivers 507bhp. No car Mercedes or Audi can match the dinamycs and the precision of an M5. No one can beat the M division.

This car is so awesome! Fast and functional, does it get any better?

But Audi have already beaten BMW with the RS 4. It certainly looks like they will dominate again with this.

To bmwaddict: The RS 4 is based on a 5+ y/o platform, and everybody said the new M3 would take it. But guess what, it hasn't! It barely matches the RS 4's output. N/A engines only have the advantage of "instant torque" but as we all know the M5 doesn't reach it's peak torque until higher up in the rev-range, and I can assure you Audi's V10 TT will deliver more torque, sooner. Also, the reason why Audi did not go with a high reving N/A V10 engine is because it would not put out as much torque. To norther: The M5's engine is a 507 HP engine, but they decided to detune it on initial start-up so that it's not an "un-wieldly" car. Also, there is no difference between AMG, Quattro GmbH (produces Audi's one-off cars, and RS cars), and the M division. They're all "official Tuners" of their respective marquees. Please get your facts straight before babbeling useless info on here.

Audi srorts cars are much better than BMW's. Ask a profissional !!

Ladies first off lets get your facts all in line the BMW M5 is a 507bhp and yes only when the power button is pushed, but when not its 400bhp, the M-power engine produces 507bhp that is its max line. So please dont tell me its weak. Also I'm sorry to say but all these wounderful cars have V10s AMG ueses a V8 6.2L that pushes out 510bhp. This Audi RS6 may sound amazing but I own a 2003 Audi RS6 saloon with 450bhp and it has a 0-60 time of 4.4sec the new one is almost the same and it pushes out 130 more bhp, they put all that horse power under the hood and I cant go faster now come on thats no fun. In any case any way you look at it BMW M5, Mercedes E63 AMG, and the new Audi RS6 are all with in the 4.4-4.7sec range, I dont think we should be fighting over what cars faster, but once you've test driven all these then let every one know what you think because power isn't everything and thats coming from some one that has an RS6 and a M6 coupe and an SL55 and these cars are matched, all amazing to drive and fun, thanks for reading, drive safe!

bmw's M5 is not a 507 bhp as they say. it is a 400 bhp engine. it is tuned to this power, and increases to 507 only when u push the so called SPORT button located near the gear stick. that's when the engine power goes up, the suspesion stiffens and everything gets tight. my opinion: it's a weak engine compared to the new RS6. so what if it's aspirated? the m5 is much slower. and the mercs, the AMG, well....they're not mercs, they're AMGs. it seems mercedes doesen't have enough knowledge or money to create their own super sport sedan, like audi and bmw. someone else has to do it. what if audi's super sport sedan was built/modified by ABT, or bmw's 3 or 5 series built by hamann?..that wouldn't be an authentic audi, or bmw

For NauAudiS4: either way dude, i think mercedes and bmw are weaker...at least for the moment. this rs6 is just stunning. For Xenomorph: i don't think bmw is BEATEN by audi (maybe the merc is). the rs4 is faster in corners, and on wet roads, snow etc, due to its great quattro tech. but in a straight line i think the m3 is faster, all the m3's were. For Tolga: you talking about this 810 HP M5? http://www.rsportscars.com/eng/cars/cmc_m5.asp .. dude, that's "old"...and it's not an BMW, it's an "Currency Motor Cars" modified M5.

M5 is nothing when we compare it with the RS6.

maybe you dont know the SLR !!

All of you Audi fan's. Look at all the tests on Youtube. The old M (343 hp)beats the old S4 way ahead. The test is made by The Stig. Also on the track there is no match for the E46 M3. And they say the new one is better on the track. Tiff Needell from Fifth Gear, top car journalist, said the M5 is a masterpiece, the most precise saloon he has ever driven. It's not all about power, and proves it. They squeezed another 130hp into the new RS6, but 0-100km/h dropped just 0.1 sec. On the track that's nothing. No car can beat the M5 on the track, Merc, or Audi.

Regarding the power management on the M5, switching from 400 to 507hp. On normal regims, the car is runing on 400 hp for fuel efficiency and lower emissions. This makes it even a better car, looking from this point of view. It has the most precise steering put on serial saloons today, the fastest gearbox, etc, etc. Audi has made important steps, has already beaten the Mercedes, but still has a lot to work to catch up BMW. I think everyone is missing important facts like suspension, steering, braking. All those are better in the M5.

editYou've got no ideea whatsorever of what you're talking about!What's the fastest Mercedes ever produced? Tell me.

Sebfill55 i know the test, i have the top gear collection. but, i think u watched on google only the straight line test. and i know, the s4 is beaten by far, but they tested the car on the track..wich is faster. and the s4 beat it good, by a couple of seconds

ITS A MONSTER, I LLLLLLLOOOOOOOOOVVVVVVEEEEEEEEEEEE IT

Who ever likes the SLR you can't dene the RS6 has got style

If it wasn't for McLaren's touch Mercedes would not have a supercar. The SLR is not a Mercedes smartie! The fastest Mercedes ever built is the CLS Brabus Rocket, he's a Mercedes fan and he doesn't know what's the fastest car of his lame brand. Such fans, such brand.

I'm sorry but the fastest benz ever made was the CLK GTR!

no, the SLR is faster.. make sure !!