Jaguar XF Officially Revealed in Detail
Add a Comment
Login
Comments (17)
Looks to American-esque to me
oh well, tho much better when on the move
CAR Magazine in the UK have some good video of the Jag on the move, and at the 'Ring too
August 28, 2007 8:34 am
jaguar is screwed. this car is so americanized..huge disporportionate chunks of wood and chrome, ugly interior especially the rear seats, pointless v8 in a sedan without a v6 offered, bulging headlights and hardly any innovative design. only the hood looks like that of a true jaguar. american car manufacturers will soon be able to do better than what jaguar is doing with their cars; the new CTS shows it.
August 28, 2007 5:44 pm
Hmmm...did the guy who designed the Grand Cherokee headlights get fired and go work for Jag?
Sorry Jaguar/Ford...BMW and Mercedes were probably worried but now are just laughing at you. You shouldn't let your engineers/purchasers meddle with a good design. Sure was beautiful and mesmerizing as a concept.
August 28, 2007 6:07 pm
Jaguar are to be applauded for the "XF".
The audaciousness/boldness of the styling's "design change" answers the question, "how would Jaguar break-away from the past?" This car allows for a new "Corporate image" and much wider commercial viability in the global market.
It's a clean break from the past and allows Jaguar "design-joy" for decades to come. Well done!!
Isaac Uwagwu
August 28, 2007 10:56 pm
A Jaguar should look anything but this, front americanized shape. The back line is still in the british design, the interior line is undecided. I think they really screwed up big time with this model. I alredy miss the old XF, such very british beautiful lines, also the E-type, and XF look great from every side you look at it. Why should Jaguar run from it's past.It should stay the same way, styled, conservatory lines. They traded those for those ugly front headlights. I hope Ford will soon sell the mark.BMW should buy, they know what a real Jag should look like.
August 29, 2007 4:30 am
Americanized design? Hardly.. everything from the A-pillar back looks just like the Lexus GS! The headlights are a disaster, for sure.. but more disturbing is the lack of a true "haunch" over the rear wheels (like on XK and XJ).. the only surface development is going the wrong way -- the line from the center of the doors forward to the front wheels looks lifted straight off of a Passat.
August 29, 2007 4:54 am
Anyone notice the resemblance of the overall design to the Buick Lucerne?? It's a huge deviation in styling from the prev. gen., and it's very mainstream, good luck to Jaguar with the new design. But it doesn't look like a jag anymore.
September 1, 2007 11:23 pm
Brilliant, i know someone who owns an X-type, i just hope he gets this monster.
September 28, 2007 5:22 pm
WHAT A GEORGOUSLY GREAT CAR - TYPICAL OF ALL JAGS, SPECIALLY THIS - A GREAT NEW DESIGN LANGUAGE FOR JAG, WHICH CLEVERLY BLENDS GREAT JAGS FROM THE PAST INTO AN EXTREMELY MODERN FORMAT, HOPE GOOD MOVE FOR JAGUAR, AND WILL GET THEM OUT OF STUPID FORD - WHO COCKED UP JAG BIGTIME.
Oh bmw addict WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU CHATTIN' ABOUT, BMW SHOULD BUY JAG?? ARE YOU DREAMING BOY, - its time you woke up, let Jag come back to their original state and they will show you how to kill bmw, have you seen the lan and see difference in Jaguars great hisory and cars compared to the shit-hole of bmw's.
MERCEDES AND JAGUAR RULE,........... BMW - HA HA HA HA.
October 10, 2007 6:39 pm
Marsman.... Go to some highly ranked eye clinic, and get your eyes check....PLEASE...mate seriously how could you even think.
October 13, 2007 6:56 pm
Thins is oneof the most Handsome cars to DATE in my opinon uff i saw it in real life i swear i could have bowed to it
December 6, 2007 2:53 pm









